Adult education in a neoliberal policy paradigm

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nuala Glanton
{"title":"Adult education in a neoliberal policy paradigm","authors":"Nuala Glanton","doi":"10.1080/03323315.2023.2259377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten years on from the formation of SOLAS (An tSeirbhís Oideachais Leanúnaig agus Scileanna) and the Education and Training Boards (ETBs) in Ireland, it is appropriate to reflect on where adult education lies in the new Further Education and Training (FET) sector. This paper uses Denis O'Sullivan's schematisation of policy paradigms (2005) as an analytical tool, to explore the components of the new sector. New concepts have been introduced, such as ‘FET’ and ‘active inclusion’, others such as ‘adult education’ have disappeared, and others such as ‘transversal skills’, ‘lifelong learning’ and the ‘needs of learners’ have been adapted, introducing a language of doublespeak. The discourse has changed; a theme of performativity is now prioritised while the wider benefits of learning are mentioned, but not actioned. There is a new authority with bureaucratic social configurations and the identities of teachers and students are being reduced to producers and consumers of learning outcomes. This paper shows how these changes have resulted in a new neoliberal policy paradigm for adult education, with strong regulatory powers. Understanding this is the first step in questioning its authority and discussing if this is what we, as a society, want for the education of adults.","PeriodicalId":46076,"journal":{"name":"Irish Educational Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2259377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ten years on from the formation of SOLAS (An tSeirbhís Oideachais Leanúnaig agus Scileanna) and the Education and Training Boards (ETBs) in Ireland, it is appropriate to reflect on where adult education lies in the new Further Education and Training (FET) sector. This paper uses Denis O'Sullivan's schematisation of policy paradigms (2005) as an analytical tool, to explore the components of the new sector. New concepts have been introduced, such as ‘FET’ and ‘active inclusion’, others such as ‘adult education’ have disappeared, and others such as ‘transversal skills’, ‘lifelong learning’ and the ‘needs of learners’ have been adapted, introducing a language of doublespeak. The discourse has changed; a theme of performativity is now prioritised while the wider benefits of learning are mentioned, but not actioned. There is a new authority with bureaucratic social configurations and the identities of teachers and students are being reduced to producers and consumers of learning outcomes. This paper shows how these changes have resulted in a new neoliberal policy paradigm for adult education, with strong regulatory powers. Understanding this is the first step in questioning its authority and discussing if this is what we, as a society, want for the education of adults.
新自由主义政策范式下的成人教育
自SOLAS (tSeirbhís Oideachais Leanúnaig agus Scileanna)和爱尔兰教育培训委员会(ETBs)成立十年以来,反思成人教育在新的继续教育和培训(FET)部门中的地位是合适的。本文使用Denis O'Sullivan的政策范式图式(2005)作为分析工具,探索新部门的组成部分。新的概念被引入,如“FET”和“积极包容”,其他概念,如“成人教育”已经消失,其他概念,如“横向技能”,“终身学习”和“学习者的需求”已经被改编,引入了一种双重语言。话语已经改变;表演的主题现在被优先考虑,而学习的更广泛的好处被提及,但没有采取行动。这是一种具有官僚社会结构的新权威,教师和学生的身份正在沦为学习成果的生产者和消费者。本文展示了这些变化如何导致了一种具有强大监管权力的成人教育新自由主义政策范式。理解这一点是质疑其权威和讨论这是否是我们作为一个社会所希望的成人教育的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Educational Studies
Irish Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
23.50%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信