Jurassic heritance of the geomorphology in Mid Norway

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Odleiv Olesen, Håkon G. Rueslåtten, Jasmin Schönenberger, Morten Smelror, Roelant van der Lelij, Bjørn Eskil Larsen, Lars Olsen, Vikas Baranwal, Arne Bjørlykke, Marco Brönner, Jomar Gellein, Jan Steinar Rønning
{"title":"Jurassic heritance of the geomorphology in Mid Norway","authors":"Odleiv Olesen, Håkon G. Rueslåtten, Jasmin Schönenberger, Morten Smelror, Roelant van der Lelij, Bjørn Eskil Larsen, Lars Olsen, Vikas Baranwal, Arne Bjørlykke, Marco Brönner, Jomar Gellein, Jan Steinar Rønning","doi":"10.17850/njg103-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The age and formation of the Scandinavian mountains and the Norwegian strandflat have long been the subject of dispute. Some researchers argue that the present-day mountains are remains of the Caledonian orogen while others claim that the Caledonian nappes after erosion were buried by Mesozoic sediments and subsequently exhumed. In order to clarify these issues, we have studied remains of chemically weathered rocks (saprolites) from the coast to the interior of central Norway. The multidisciplinary study includes digital topography, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), XRD, XRF, palynological analyses and K–Ar dating of samples from outcrops, trenches and core drilling. The coastal areas are dominated by an outer strandflat and an inner joint-valley landscape, while the interior is characterised by smoother landscapes referred to as palaeo-surfaces. Remnants of pre–Tertiary weathering occur in the joint valley landscape as well as on the palaeo-surfaces. The saprolites are found within fault- and fracture-zones and at depths exceeding 50 m in drillholes. It is suggested that the old saprolites were strongly eroded along the coast and in the fjords and valleys such as in Orkdalen and Sunndalen. K–Ar dating of mainland clay alteration most frequently yielded Jurassic ages along a profile extending from the coast to the Dovrefjell mountains (c. 1400 m a.s.l.). The formation age of the smectite- and kaolinite-containing saprolites seems to be almost contemporaneous along this profile implying that the entire area was subject to weathering in a warm and humid climate, such as prevailed during the Late Triassic and Jurassic. Palynological residues containing thermally altered Triassic and Jurassic pollen and spores in the clay-infected bedrock lend support to the saprolite interpretation. The Mesozoic landscape in central Norway was consequently shaped by uplift and deep weathering in the Jurassic. The entire Trøndelag county was most likely covered by Mesozoic sedimentary rocks until Cenozoic exhumation. The landscape was modified by Cenozoic tectonic uplift and erosion, and finally reworked by Pleistocene glacial erosion. We therefore conclude that both the observed saprolites and the shape of the present-day landscape in central Norway give a strong impression of the original Jurassic weathering surface.","PeriodicalId":49741,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Journal of Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian Journal of Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17850/njg103-3-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The age and formation of the Scandinavian mountains and the Norwegian strandflat have long been the subject of dispute. Some researchers argue that the present-day mountains are remains of the Caledonian orogen while others claim that the Caledonian nappes after erosion were buried by Mesozoic sediments and subsequently exhumed. In order to clarify these issues, we have studied remains of chemically weathered rocks (saprolites) from the coast to the interior of central Norway. The multidisciplinary study includes digital topography, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), XRD, XRF, palynological analyses and K–Ar dating of samples from outcrops, trenches and core drilling. The coastal areas are dominated by an outer strandflat and an inner joint-valley landscape, while the interior is characterised by smoother landscapes referred to as palaeo-surfaces. Remnants of pre–Tertiary weathering occur in the joint valley landscape as well as on the palaeo-surfaces. The saprolites are found within fault- and fracture-zones and at depths exceeding 50 m in drillholes. It is suggested that the old saprolites were strongly eroded along the coast and in the fjords and valleys such as in Orkdalen and Sunndalen. K–Ar dating of mainland clay alteration most frequently yielded Jurassic ages along a profile extending from the coast to the Dovrefjell mountains (c. 1400 m a.s.l.). The formation age of the smectite- and kaolinite-containing saprolites seems to be almost contemporaneous along this profile implying that the entire area was subject to weathering in a warm and humid climate, such as prevailed during the Late Triassic and Jurassic. Palynological residues containing thermally altered Triassic and Jurassic pollen and spores in the clay-infected bedrock lend support to the saprolite interpretation. The Mesozoic landscape in central Norway was consequently shaped by uplift and deep weathering in the Jurassic. The entire Trøndelag county was most likely covered by Mesozoic sedimentary rocks until Cenozoic exhumation. The landscape was modified by Cenozoic tectonic uplift and erosion, and finally reworked by Pleistocene glacial erosion. We therefore conclude that both the observed saprolites and the shape of the present-day landscape in central Norway give a strong impression of the original Jurassic weathering surface.
挪威中部地貌的侏罗纪遗产
斯堪的那维亚山脉和挪威海岸的年龄和形成一直是争论的主题。一些研究人员认为,现在的山脉是加里东造山带的遗迹,而另一些研究人员则认为,加里东造山带被侵蚀后的推覆体被中生代沉积物掩埋,随后被挖掘出来。为了澄清这些问题,我们研究了从挪威中部海岸到内陆的化学风化岩石(腐绿岩)遗骸。这项多学科研究包括数字地形、电阻率层析成像(ERT)、XRD、XRF、孢粉分析以及露头、海沟和岩心钻探样品的K-Ar定年。沿海地区以外滩平原和内联合山谷景观为主,而内部则以平滑的景观为特征,称为古地表。前第三纪风化的残余物既存在于联合山谷地貌中,也存在于古地表。腐殖岩是在断裂和裂缝带内以及钻孔深度超过50 m处发现的。认为古腐岩在沿岸及奥克达伦和森达伦等峡湾和山谷中受到强烈侵蚀。大陆粘土蚀变的K-Ar定年最常见的结果是从海岸延伸到Dovrefjell山脉的剖面(约公元1400米)得出侏罗纪时代。含蒙脱石和高岭石的腐腐岩的形成年代似乎几乎是同时期的,这意味着整个地区受到温暖潮湿气候的风化,例如晚三叠世和侏罗纪。在受粘土感染的基岩中,含有热蚀变的三叠纪和侏罗纪花粉和孢子的孢粉残留物支持腐殖岩解释。因此,挪威中部的中生代景观是由侏罗纪的隆升和深层风化作用形成的。整个Trøndelag县很可能被中生代沉积岩覆盖,直到新生代发掘。经过新生代构造隆升和侵蚀的改造,最后又经过更新世冰川侵蚀的改造。因此,我们得出结论,无论是观测到的腐绿岩,还是挪威中部现今景观的形状,都给人留下了原始侏罗纪风化表面的强烈印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Norwegian Journal of Geology
Norwegian Journal of Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Norwegian Journal of Geology publishes high-quality, fully peer-review papers from all geoscientific disciplines. Papers are commonly based on regional studies and should emphasise the development of understanding of fundamental geological processes. More specialised papers can also be submitted, but should be written in a way that is easily understood by nonspecialists, and illustrate the progress being made within that specific topic in geosciences. We also encourage initiatives for thematic issues within the scope of the Journal.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信