Personal Agenda-Public Agenda Congruency: A Contingent Condition for Agenda-setting Effects

Q1 Social Sciences
Raquel Rodríguez-Díaz, Maxwell McCombs
{"title":"Personal Agenda-Public Agenda Congruency: A Contingent Condition for Agenda-setting Effects","authors":"Raquel Rodríguez-Díaz, Maxwell McCombs","doi":"10.15581/003.36.4.191-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the concept of the impact area as the intersection between the common issues of the personal agenda and the public agenda. Expanding the concept of agenda-setting effects, which focuses mainly on the relation between the public and media agendas, we have examined the congruity of the public agenda and the personal agenda as a contingent condition for the strength of these effects. The concept also distinguishes between the top-priority issues of the public and personal agendas, setting out that the general public’s search for information about these top-priority issues highlights the need for orientation. We used data from Spain to focus on the national elections (2011, 2015 and 2019), plus the beginning of the pandemic (2020). The study includes a content analysis of the El País daily newspaper for the four periods and a variety of surveys and representative electoral barometers. To those data we have added an analysis of the main search topics on Google Trends for each of the four years. The results reveal that variations in the relationship between the public and personal agendas are linked to the strength of the agenda-setting effect between the media and public agendas.","PeriodicalId":35210,"journal":{"name":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.4.191-212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on the concept of the impact area as the intersection between the common issues of the personal agenda and the public agenda. Expanding the concept of agenda-setting effects, which focuses mainly on the relation between the public and media agendas, we have examined the congruity of the public agenda and the personal agenda as a contingent condition for the strength of these effects. The concept also distinguishes between the top-priority issues of the public and personal agendas, setting out that the general public’s search for information about these top-priority issues highlights the need for orientation. We used data from Spain to focus on the national elections (2011, 2015 and 2019), plus the beginning of the pandemic (2020). The study includes a content analysis of the El País daily newspaper for the four periods and a variety of surveys and representative electoral barometers. To those data we have added an analysis of the main search topics on Google Trends for each of the four years. The results reveal that variations in the relationship between the public and personal agendas are linked to the strength of the agenda-setting effect between the media and public agendas.
个人议程-公共议程一致性:议程设置效应的偶然条件
本文将影响区域的概念视为个人议程和公共议程共同问题的交叉点。扩展议程设置效应的概念,主要关注公共议程和媒体议程之间的关系,我们研究了公共议程和个人议程的一致性,作为这些效应强度的偶然条件。这一概念还区分了公共议程的最优先问题和个人议程的最优先问题,指出一般公众对这些最优先问题的信息的搜索突出了确定方向的必要性。我们使用西班牙的数据,重点关注全国选举(2011年、2015年和2019年)以及大流行的开始(2020年)。该研究包括对四个时期的El País日报的内容分析,以及各种调查和代表性选举晴雨表。除了这些数据,我们还增加了对这四年中谷歌趋势中主要搜索主题的分析。结果表明,公共议程和个人议程之间关系的变化与媒体和公共议程之间的议程设置效应的强度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comunicacion y Sociedad
Comunicacion y Sociedad Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信