Comparison of Complications with Magnesium Sulphate & Fentanyl as Adjuvants for Epidural Labor Analgesia

Md. Abdur Rahim, Mohammad Mahabubuzzaman, Shamima Akter, Md. Saiful Islam, Md. Humayun Kabir, Md. Akkasur Rahman, Subrata Kumar Das, Humaiun Kabir, Md. Shahidullah Humayun Kabir
{"title":"Comparison of Complications with Magnesium Sulphate & Fentanyl as Adjuvants for Epidural Labor Analgesia","authors":"Md. Abdur Rahim, Mohammad Mahabubuzzaman, Shamima Akter, Md. Saiful Islam, Md. Humayun Kabir, Md. Akkasur Rahman, Subrata Kumar Das, Humaiun Kabir, Md. Shahidullah Humayun Kabir","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Effective and safe analgesia during labor has remained an ongoing challenge. Many pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of labor analgesia have been adopted over the years. Of these, neuraxial or regional analgesia has become the most popular method. Possible regional anesthesia techniques include epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia, or a combination of epidural and spinal analgesia. This study aimed to compare the complications with magnesium sulfate and fentanyl as adjuvants for epidural labor analgesia. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Palliative and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the obstetric department, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka.Bangladesh. The study was carried out from October 2020 to March 2021. A total of 60 patients were assigned by computer- generated random table to one group (Group A) and another group (Group B). Group-A (n=30): Group-A received Fentanyl 25 micrograms as adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.5% plain bupivacaine 2.5 ml+25 microgram of fentanyl 0.005% 0.5 ml + 7 ml normal saline=10 ml) via epidural catheter. Group B received MgSO4 50 mg as an adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.5% plain bupivacaine 2.5 ml + 50 mg of MgSO4 10% 0.5 ml +7 ml normal saline=10 ml) via epidural catheter. Data were statistically described in terms of mean ± standard deviation (±SD), or frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups was done using the student t-test for independent samples. For comparing categorical data, a Chi-square (x2) test was performed. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. F-value was determined by the Repeated measured ANOVA test where data were repeated more than one time. All statistical calculations were done using the computer program SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 22 for ........","PeriodicalId":471520,"journal":{"name":"Scholars journal of applied medical sciences","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars journal of applied medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i10.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective and safe analgesia during labor has remained an ongoing challenge. Many pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of labor analgesia have been adopted over the years. Of these, neuraxial or regional analgesia has become the most popular method. Possible regional anesthesia techniques include epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia, or a combination of epidural and spinal analgesia. This study aimed to compare the complications with magnesium sulfate and fentanyl as adjuvants for epidural labor analgesia. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Palliative and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the obstetric department, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka.Bangladesh. The study was carried out from October 2020 to March 2021. A total of 60 patients were assigned by computer- generated random table to one group (Group A) and another group (Group B). Group-A (n=30): Group-A received Fentanyl 25 micrograms as adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.5% plain bupivacaine 2.5 ml+25 microgram of fentanyl 0.005% 0.5 ml + 7 ml normal saline=10 ml) via epidural catheter. Group B received MgSO4 50 mg as an adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.5% plain bupivacaine 2.5 ml + 50 mg of MgSO4 10% 0.5 ml +7 ml normal saline=10 ml) via epidural catheter. Data were statistically described in terms of mean ± standard deviation (±SD), or frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups was done using the student t-test for independent samples. For comparing categorical data, a Chi-square (x2) test was performed. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. F-value was determined by the Repeated measured ANOVA test where data were repeated more than one time. All statistical calculations were done using the computer program SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) version 22 for ........
硫酸镁治疗并发症的比较芬太尼在硬膜外分娩镇痛中的辅助作用
导读:有效和安全的分娩镇痛仍然是一个持续的挑战。多年来,许多药物和非药物的分娩镇痛方法被采用。其中,神经轴或局部镇痛已成为最常用的方法。可能的区域麻醉技术包括硬膜外镇痛、脊髓镇痛或硬膜外和脊髓联合镇痛。本研究旨在比较硫酸镁和芬太尼作为辅助剂用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的并发症。方法:这项前瞻性比较研究在孟加拉国达卡医学院麻醉、镇痛、姑息和重症医学系与产科合作进行。该研究于2020年10月至2021年3月进行。采用计算机随机表法将60例患者分为A组和B组。A组(n=30): A组患者经硬膜外导管给予芬太尼25微克辅助布比卡因(0.5%普通布比卡因2.5 ml+25微克芬太尼0.005% 0.5 ml+ 7 ml生理盐水=10 ml)。B组经硬膜外导管给予MgSO4 50 mg作为布比卡因的辅助剂(0.5%普通布比卡因2.5 ml + 50mg MgSO4 10% 0.5 ml +7 ml生理盐水=10 ml)。数据以平均值±标准差(±SD)或频率(病例数)和百分比进行统计描述。使用独立样本的学生t检验对研究组之间的数值变量进行比较。比较分类资料时,采用卡方(x2)检验。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。f值由重复测量ANOVA检验确定,其中数据重复了一次以上。所有统计计算均使用SPSS (statistical Package for Social Science;SPSS Inc.,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,美国)版本22 ........
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信