On the links between climate scepticism and right-wing populism (RWP): an explanatory approach based on cultural political economy (CPE)

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tobias Haas
{"title":"On the links between climate scepticism and right-wing populism (RWP): an explanatory approach based on cultural political economy (CPE)","authors":"Tobias Haas","doi":"10.1080/13563467.2023.2275017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various analyses show that right-wing populist parties (RWP) tend to be sceptical of climate science and policy. This points to a blank space in the dominant analyses of populism: their blindness towards society-nature relations. This paper aims to develop an approach grounded in Cultural Political Economy (CPE) that can be used to decipher the mediation of RWP within the context of economic, political, and cultural developments as well as society–nature relations. Against this background, the argument is developed that RWP is concerned not only with countering migration and processes of societal liberalisation, but also with defending an existing way of life that is firmly rooted in the destructive appropriation of nature. As a current of right-wing politics, RWP defends the imperial mode of living by expressing scepticism towards the existence of anthropogenic climate change. The paper contributes to a better understanding of the political economy of RWP by linking the dimensions of social domination with the appropriation of nature.","PeriodicalId":51447,"journal":{"name":"New Political Economy","volume":" 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2275017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various analyses show that right-wing populist parties (RWP) tend to be sceptical of climate science and policy. This points to a blank space in the dominant analyses of populism: their blindness towards society-nature relations. This paper aims to develop an approach grounded in Cultural Political Economy (CPE) that can be used to decipher the mediation of RWP within the context of economic, political, and cultural developments as well as society–nature relations. Against this background, the argument is developed that RWP is concerned not only with countering migration and processes of societal liberalisation, but also with defending an existing way of life that is firmly rooted in the destructive appropriation of nature. As a current of right-wing politics, RWP defends the imperial mode of living by expressing scepticism towards the existence of anthropogenic climate change. The paper contributes to a better understanding of the political economy of RWP by linking the dimensions of social domination with the appropriation of nature.
气候怀疑主义与右翼民粹主义(RWP)的联系:基于文化政治经济学(CPE)的解释方法
各种分析表明,右翼民粹主义政党(RWP)倾向于对气候科学和政策持怀疑态度。这指出了民粹主义主流分析中的一个空白:他们对社会-自然关系的盲目。本文旨在发展一种基于文化政治经济学(CPE)的方法,该方法可用于解读RWP在经济,政治和文化发展以及社会-自然关系背景下的中介作用。在此背景下,有观点认为,RWP不仅关注反对移民和社会自由化进程,而且还关注捍卫现有的生活方式,这种生活方式牢固地植根于对自然的破坏性占有。作为右翼政治的一股潮流,RWP通过对人为气候变化的存在表示怀疑来捍卫帝国主义的生活方式。本文通过将社会支配的维度与自然的占有联系起来,有助于更好地理解RWP的政治经济学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: New Political Economy aims to create a forum for work which combines the breadth of vision which characterised the classical political economy of the nineteenth century with the analytical advances of twentieth century social science. It seeks to represent the terrain of political economy scholarship across different disciplines, emphasising original and innovative work which explores new approaches and methodologies, and addresses core debates and issues of historical and contemporary relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信