Exploring fair scheduling aspects – Through final exam scheduling

Q3 Engineering

Pollack Periodica Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1556/606.2023.00780

Szilvia Jáhn-Erdős, Bence Kővári

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Fair treatment of individuals in a scheduling task is essential. Unfairness can cause dissatisfaction among workers, faster obsolescence of work tools and underutilization of others. The literature's definitions vary, and there is no clear definition of general scheduling tasks. This article explores fair scheduling through the lens of final exams, aiming to extend decision support system methodologies. It proposes a method based on Lipschitz mapping to measure fairness and presents a pseudo-algorithm for estimating optimal trend lines. The model and the algorithm are demonstrated using the example of final exam schedules. In this way, two feasible solutions can be measured and compared in terms of fairness.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探索公平安排方面-通过期末考试安排

在调度任务中公平对待个人是至关重要的。不公平会引起工人的不满，加速工作工具的过时和对其他工具的利用不足。文献对调度任务的定义各不相同，对一般调度任务没有明确的定义。本文通过期末考试的镜头探讨公平调度，旨在扩展决策支持系统的方法。提出了一种基于Lipschitz映射的公平性度量方法，并给出了一种估计最优趋势线的伪算法。最后以期末考试日程为例对模型和算法进行了验证。这样，两个可行的解决方案就可以在公平性方面进行衡量和比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pollack Periodica Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Pollack Periodica is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international forum for the presentation, discussion and dissemination of the latest advances and developments in engineering and informatics. Pollack Periodica invites papers reporting new research and applications from a wide range of discipline, including civil, mechanical, electrical, environmental, earthquake, material and information engineering. The journal aims at reaching a wider audience, not only researchers, but also those likely to be most affected by research results, for example designers, fabricators, specialists, developers, computer scientists managers in academic, governmental and industrial communities.