Exploring stakeholders' response to travel needs of commuters with disability in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Prince Kwame Odame, Regina Obilie Amoako-Sakyi, Albert Abane, Mark Zuidgeest
{"title":"Exploring stakeholders' response to travel needs of commuters with disability in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly","authors":"Prince Kwame Odame,&nbsp;Regina Obilie Amoako-Sakyi,&nbsp;Albert Abane,&nbsp;Mark Zuidgeest","doi":"10.1002/geo2.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Access to public transport increases vulnerable people's social mobility, facilitates economic integration and improves general well-being. This is possible given the low vehicular acquisition and low cost required to enjoy public transport services. Unfortunately, the discourse on the responsiveness of public transport services to the disability community in the Global South has been viewed from users' perspectives, leaving out key stakeholders whose actions impact persons with disability (PWDs') mobility needs. This study seeks to fill the gap by exploring stakeholders' responses to the travel needs of commuters with disability in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly. Employing an exploratory research design, this study purposively engaged five national stakeholders on transport and disability issues. All interviews and transcripts were transcribed using MaxQDA. The qualitative data analysis was iterative as the study adopted a thematic analytical approach to explore participants' opinions. From the data, all stakeholders did not have a disability-inclined transport agenda or policy despite making various attempts to meet the travel needs of PWDs. Some attempts include the reliance on one's discretion as seen in the case of transport operators, while other stakeholders appeared to offer little support due to financial and administrative bottlenecks. Transport-oriented stakeholders cared little about PWD while disability-oriented stakeholders cared little about transport issues. This study recommends a consultative action framework to guide all stakeholders in ensuring the delivery of barrier-free transport services to the disability community.</p>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/geo2.129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to public transport increases vulnerable people's social mobility, facilitates economic integration and improves general well-being. This is possible given the low vehicular acquisition and low cost required to enjoy public transport services. Unfortunately, the discourse on the responsiveness of public transport services to the disability community in the Global South has been viewed from users' perspectives, leaving out key stakeholders whose actions impact persons with disability (PWDs') mobility needs. This study seeks to fill the gap by exploring stakeholders' responses to the travel needs of commuters with disability in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly. Employing an exploratory research design, this study purposively engaged five national stakeholders on transport and disability issues. All interviews and transcripts were transcribed using MaxQDA. The qualitative data analysis was iterative as the study adopted a thematic analytical approach to explore participants' opinions. From the data, all stakeholders did not have a disability-inclined transport agenda or policy despite making various attempts to meet the travel needs of PWDs. Some attempts include the reliance on one's discretion as seen in the case of transport operators, while other stakeholders appeared to offer little support due to financial and administrative bottlenecks. Transport-oriented stakeholders cared little about PWD while disability-oriented stakeholders cared little about transport issues. This study recommends a consultative action framework to guide all stakeholders in ensuring the delivery of barrier-free transport services to the disability community.

Abstract Image

在阿克拉市议会探讨利益相关者对残疾通勤者出行需求的回应
获得公共交通可以增加弱势群体的社会流动性,促进经济一体化,改善总体福祉。这是可能的,因为车辆购置少,享受公共交通服务所需的费用也低。不幸的是,关于公共交通服务对全球南方残疾人社区的响应的论述是从用户的角度出发的,而忽略了其行动影响残疾人(PWDs)出行需求的关键利益相关者。本研究试图通过探索阿克拉市议会中利益相关者对残疾通勤者出行需求的回应来填补这一空白。本研究采用探索性研究设计,有意让五个国家的利益相关者参与交通和残疾问题。所有访谈和文字记录均使用MaxQDA进行转录。定性数据分析是迭代的,因为研究采用主题分析方法来探索参与者的意见。从数据来看,尽管所有利益相关者都做出了各种努力,以满足残疾人士的出行需求,但并没有制定适合残疾人士的交通议程或政策。一些尝试包括依靠个人的自由裁量权,就像运输运营商的情况一样,而其他利益相关者似乎由于财政和行政瓶颈而提供的支持很少。以交通为导向的利益相关者很少关心残疾人问题,而以残疾人为导向的利益相关者很少关心交通问题。本研究建议建立一个协商行动框架,以指导所有利益攸关方确保向残疾人社区提供无障碍交通服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信