Effect of different methods of depulping on viability, germination, seedling vigour and its economic analysis in neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.)

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
P. Masilamani, V. Alex Albert, S. Selvam, K. Kumaran
{"title":"Effect of different methods of depulping on viability, germination, seedling vigour and its economic analysis in neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.)","authors":"P. Masilamani, V. Alex Albert, S. Selvam, K. Kumaran","doi":"10.59515/rma.2023.v44.i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted to determine the effect of different methods of de-pulping on viability, germination, seedling vigour and the economics of post-harvest seed management in terms of its quality for seedling production and industrial application. The physiologically matured ripe yellowish green-coloured fruits of neem were harvested manually, and the seeds were extracted by manual and mechanical de-pulping. In each method, skin weight (kg), pulp weight (kg), man-hour requirements, cost of de-pulping (Rs/kg), seed recovery (%) and moisture content (%) were calculated. After de-pulping, seeds were manually washed with water and time taken for washing the de-pulped seeds was also calculated. After that seeds were dried in threshing yard and moisture content of seed was calculated. Dried seeds were processed using cleaner cum grader in mechanical method and sieves in manual method. In both the methods, fruit to seed recovery (%) were calculated. The effect of manual and mechanical seed extraction on viability (%), germination (%) and seedling vigour was analyzed. Results revealed that mechanical method of de-pulping (45.5kg) exhibited an additional wet seed weight of 1.5kg compared to manual method (44kg). The seed recovery from one ton of neem fruits was 170.5 kg in manual de-pulping and 164 kg in mechanical de-pulping. The processing cost of one kg of neem seed was Rs.9.03 for manual de-pulping and Rs.2.49 for mechanical de-pulping. Among the two methods of seed extraction, even though there was not much variation in seed recovery, germination and seedling vigour, mechanical method had the advantage of 160 minutes less time duration for extraction and minimal processing cost per kg of seed extraction with higher seedling vigour index.","PeriodicalId":49636,"journal":{"name":"Range Management and Agroforestry","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Range Management and Agroforestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59515/rma.2023.v44.i1.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine the effect of different methods of de-pulping on viability, germination, seedling vigour and the economics of post-harvest seed management in terms of its quality for seedling production and industrial application. The physiologically matured ripe yellowish green-coloured fruits of neem were harvested manually, and the seeds were extracted by manual and mechanical de-pulping. In each method, skin weight (kg), pulp weight (kg), man-hour requirements, cost of de-pulping (Rs/kg), seed recovery (%) and moisture content (%) were calculated. After de-pulping, seeds were manually washed with water and time taken for washing the de-pulped seeds was also calculated. After that seeds were dried in threshing yard and moisture content of seed was calculated. Dried seeds were processed using cleaner cum grader in mechanical method and sieves in manual method. In both the methods, fruit to seed recovery (%) were calculated. The effect of manual and mechanical seed extraction on viability (%), germination (%) and seedling vigour was analyzed. Results revealed that mechanical method of de-pulping (45.5kg) exhibited an additional wet seed weight of 1.5kg compared to manual method (44kg). The seed recovery from one ton of neem fruits was 170.5 kg in manual de-pulping and 164 kg in mechanical de-pulping. The processing cost of one kg of neem seed was Rs.9.03 for manual de-pulping and Rs.2.49 for mechanical de-pulping. Among the two methods of seed extraction, even though there was not much variation in seed recovery, germination and seedling vigour, mechanical method had the advantage of 160 minutes less time duration for extraction and minimal processing cost per kg of seed extraction with higher seedling vigour index.
不同脱浆方法对印楝(Azadirachta indica A. Juss.)活力、萌发、幼苗活力的影响及其经济分析
本研究旨在研究不同的脱浆方法对青稞种子活力、发芽、幼苗活力的影响,以及收获后种子管理对青稞苗木生产和工业应用质量的影响。人工收获生理成熟的成熟的黄绿色印楝果实,并通过人工和机械脱浆提取种子。在每种方法中,计算皮重(kg)、浆重(kg)、所需工时、脱浆成本(Rs/kg)、种子回收率(%)和含水量(%)。脱浆后,人工用水清洗种子,并计算洗净脱浆种子所需的时间。然后在脱粒场烘干种子,计算种子的含水率。干燥种子采用机械清洗机和分级机进行加工,采用人工筛子进行加工。两种方法均计算了果实到种子的回收率(%)。分析了人工和机械浸种对种子活力(%)、发芽率(%)和幼苗活力的影响。结果显示,机械脱浆法(45.5kg)比手工脱浆法(44kg)多出1.5kg的湿籽重量。每吨印楝果人工脱浆的种子回收率为170.5 kg,机械脱浆的种子回收率为164 kg。每公斤印度楝籽的人工脱浆成本为9.03卢比,机械脱浆成本为2.49卢比。两种提取方法中,虽然在种子恢复、发芽和幼苗活力方面差异不大,但机械法提取时间少160 min,每公斤提取种子加工成本低,幼苗活力指数高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
62.50%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Society has been established with the following objectives: 1. To advance the cause of research activity in all aspects of rangelands and to encourage and promote the studies on rangeland, wasteland ecosystems and agroforestry. 2. To provide facilities for seminars and conferences to rangeland researchers, development workers and farmers and to encourage close cooperation with organizations having related aims and interests. 3. To disseminate the knowledge of scientific agriculture and technology for forage and rangeland production, improvement and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信