The International Turn in Far-Right Studies: A Critical Assessment

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Rodrigo Duque Estrada Campos
{"title":"The International Turn in Far-Right Studies: A Critical Assessment","authors":"Rodrigo Duque Estrada Campos","doi":"10.1177/03058298231198992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been an intense public debate regarding the worldwide re-emergence of far-right politics and the ways in which it has engaged with the international. Surprisingly, thus far there have been no reflections on the broader implications of conceptualising the far-right in its international, transnational, and global dimensions. This article argues that we are witnessing an international turn in far-right studies that posits the international as constitutive of far-right politics, opening new forms of understanding it both from a historical and theoretical point of view. It develops a conceptual assessment of the international turn in three steps: first, it identifies that what binds this interdisciplinary literature together and breaks away from mainstream approaches is a shared critique of methodological nationalism; second, it classifies innovations in two different conceptual levels: the ‘globalisation front’, which sees transformations in the nature of far-right politics due the intensification of globalisation, and the ‘historiographical front’, which claims that the far-right has always been an international phenomenon. The article then analyses the main limitations of the international turn and offers a way to overcome it by articulating an intersocietal approach to the study of the far-right that draws from Global Historical Sociology.","PeriodicalId":18593,"journal":{"name":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","volume":"310 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298231198992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an intense public debate regarding the worldwide re-emergence of far-right politics and the ways in which it has engaged with the international. Surprisingly, thus far there have been no reflections on the broader implications of conceptualising the far-right in its international, transnational, and global dimensions. This article argues that we are witnessing an international turn in far-right studies that posits the international as constitutive of far-right politics, opening new forms of understanding it both from a historical and theoretical point of view. It develops a conceptual assessment of the international turn in three steps: first, it identifies that what binds this interdisciplinary literature together and breaks away from mainstream approaches is a shared critique of methodological nationalism; second, it classifies innovations in two different conceptual levels: the ‘globalisation front’, which sees transformations in the nature of far-right politics due the intensification of globalisation, and the ‘historiographical front’, which claims that the far-right has always been an international phenomenon. The article then analyses the main limitations of the international turn and offers a way to overcome it by articulating an intersocietal approach to the study of the far-right that draws from Global Historical Sociology.
极右翼研究的国际转向:一项批判性评估
近年来,关于极右翼政治在世界范围内的死灰复燃及其与国际社会交往的方式,公众展开了激烈的辩论。令人惊讶的是,到目前为止,还没有人思考将极右翼概念化在国际、跨国和全球层面的更广泛含义。本文认为,我们正在目睹极右翼研究的国际转向,它将国际视为极右翼政治的组成部分,从历史和理论的角度开辟了对极右翼政治的新理解形式。它分三步对国际转向进行了概念性评估:首先,它确定将这些跨学科文献结合在一起并脱离主流方法的是对方法论民族主义的共同批评;其次,它将创新分为两个不同的概念层面:“全球化阵线”,它看到了由于全球化加剧而导致的极右翼政治性质的转变,以及“历史阵线”,它声称极右翼一直是一种国际现象。然后,文章分析了国际转向的主要局限性,并提供了一种克服它的方法,通过阐述一种来自全球历史社会学的跨社会方法来研究极右翼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信