A30 Safe Interdepartmental Learning from clinical incidents using a Quality Improvement Framework

Rasheed Kaja Mohammad, Nicola Jones, Zilley Khan
{"title":"A30 Safe Interdepartmental Learning from clinical incidents using a Quality Improvement Framework","authors":"Rasheed Kaja Mohammad, Nicola Jones, Zilley Khan","doi":"10.54531/toud6953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mistakes are an inherent learning opportunity within healthcare that can be used to prevent future loss of lives and reduce suffering. We aim to create a safe learning space within our organization that can be embedded within our quality improvement (QI) process. We have designed a bespoke framework ( Safe Interdepartmental Learning with a Quality Improvement Framework Our tertiary hospital clinical governance team in collaboration with the multi-professional education, simulation, and patient safety departments has identified 5 topics based on the root cause analysis of serious clinical incidents. This description from our recent cohort involves the recruitment of 5 different specialty teams, each consisting of 1 experienced consultant faculty and 3 other facilitating clinicians with different levels of experience in healthcare simulation. The teams prepared and designed the most suitable clinical scenario progression to address the learning objectives based on their allocated topics. Learner and peer feedback along with reflections on the session, highlighted possible change ideas to modify the subsequent scenario running. Over a period of 6 months, different learner sets were involved in the same simulation exercise with 2 further iterative modifications. The 5 teams have generated a total of 15 hours of simulation sessions using standard pre-briefing, debriefing, and evidence-based simulation techniques. The level of independent facilitation and mentoring by more advanced debriefers has been adjusted to fit the individual pace of experiential learning. To further enhance the embedded faculty development a total of 270 minutes of online discussion, reflections, and 15 topics were presented by the facilitators to create a multi-professional learning experience. The content was structured to reflect the national outcome’s framework for faculty development and the ASPIH standards guidance for simulation-based education. The recorded simulation sessions, debriefing, and topic discussions have generated a useful asynchronous online reference for the current and future cohorts. The feasibility of implementing this simulation programme integrated with a QI framework is a major step for our future prospective evaluation of the impact of translational simulation as theorized in the current literature [2] on patient outcomes and healthcare performance indicators. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"2007 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/toud6953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mistakes are an inherent learning opportunity within healthcare that can be used to prevent future loss of lives and reduce suffering. We aim to create a safe learning space within our organization that can be embedded within our quality improvement (QI) process. We have designed a bespoke framework ( Safe Interdepartmental Learning with a Quality Improvement Framework Our tertiary hospital clinical governance team in collaboration with the multi-professional education, simulation, and patient safety departments has identified 5 topics based on the root cause analysis of serious clinical incidents. This description from our recent cohort involves the recruitment of 5 different specialty teams, each consisting of 1 experienced consultant faculty and 3 other facilitating clinicians with different levels of experience in healthcare simulation. The teams prepared and designed the most suitable clinical scenario progression to address the learning objectives based on their allocated topics. Learner and peer feedback along with reflections on the session, highlighted possible change ideas to modify the subsequent scenario running. Over a period of 6 months, different learner sets were involved in the same simulation exercise with 2 further iterative modifications. The 5 teams have generated a total of 15 hours of simulation sessions using standard pre-briefing, debriefing, and evidence-based simulation techniques. The level of independent facilitation and mentoring by more advanced debriefers has been adjusted to fit the individual pace of experiential learning. To further enhance the embedded faculty development a total of 270 minutes of online discussion, reflections, and 15 topics were presented by the facilitators to create a multi-professional learning experience. The content was structured to reflect the national outcome’s framework for faculty development and the ASPIH standards guidance for simulation-based education. The recorded simulation sessions, debriefing, and topic discussions have generated a useful asynchronous online reference for the current and future cohorts. The feasibility of implementing this simulation programme integrated with a QI framework is a major step for our future prospective evaluation of the impact of translational simulation as theorized in the current literature [2] on patient outcomes and healthcare performance indicators. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
使用质量改进框架从临床事故中学习安全跨部门
在医疗保健中,错误是一个固有的学习机会,可以用来防止未来的生命损失和减少痛苦。我们的目标是在我们的组织内创建一个安全的学习空间,可以嵌入到我们的质量改进(QI)过程中。我们的三级医院临床治理团队与多专业的教育、模拟和患者安全部门合作,根据对严重临床事件的根本原因分析,确定了5个主题。我们最近的队列描述涉及5个不同专业团队的招聘,每个团队由1名经验丰富的顾问教师和3名其他具有不同医疗模拟经验水平的辅助临床医生组成。小组根据分配的主题准备和设计最合适的临床情景进展来解决学习目标。学习者和同伴的反馈以及对会议的反思,强调了可能改变的想法,以修改随后的场景运行。在6个月的时间里,不同的学习者组参与了同样的模拟练习,并进行了两次进一步的迭代修改。这5个团队使用标准的预先简报、汇报和基于证据的模拟技术,共进行了15个小时的模拟会议。更高级的汇报员的独立促进和指导水平已被调整,以适应体验式学习的个人节奏。为了进一步加强嵌入式教师的发展,主持人提供了总共270分钟的在线讨论、反思和15个主题,以创造一个多专业的学习体验。内容的结构反映了教师发展的国家成果框架和基于模拟的教育的ASPIH标准指导。记录的模拟会话、汇报和主题讨论为当前和未来的队列生成了有用的异步在线参考。实施与QI框架相结合的模拟程序的可行性是我们未来前瞻性评估当前文献[2]中对患者结果和医疗绩效指标的转化模拟影响的重要一步。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信