The Relationship Between Alienated Labor and Private Property in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844

Shihu Fu
{"title":"The Relationship Between Alienated Labor and Private Property in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844","authors":"Shihu Fu","doi":"10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(10).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Because of the \"circular argument\", the relationship between alienated labor and private property has always been a theoretical difficulty, but in fact, Marx demonstrated the relationship between the two in detail in the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 from the two aspects of logical deduction and practical expression. In order to refute the so‐called \"circular argument\", it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the two. Research methodology: In the framework of Marxism theory combined with reality. And this is a qualitative study. Result: From the logical level, alienated labor is the essence, private property is only a phenomenon, that is, alienated labor is the cause of private property, otherwise the conclusion is not valid. From the perspective of reality, the two are interactive relations.","PeriodicalId":484361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theory and Practice of Social Science","volume":"51 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theory and Practice of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(10).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Because of the "circular argument", the relationship between alienated labor and private property has always been a theoretical difficulty, but in fact, Marx demonstrated the relationship between the two in detail in the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 from the two aspects of logical deduction and practical expression. In order to refute the so‐called "circular argument", it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the two. Research methodology: In the framework of Marxism theory combined with reality. And this is a qualitative study. Result: From the logical level, alienated labor is the essence, private property is only a phenomenon, that is, alienated labor is the cause of private property, otherwise the conclusion is not valid. From the perspective of reality, the two are interactive relations.
《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中异化劳动与私有财产的关系
目的:由于“循环论证”,异化劳动与私有财产的关系一直是一个理论难题,但实际上马克思在《1844年经济哲学手稿》中从逻辑演绎和实践表达两个方面详细论证了两者的关系。为了反驳所谓的“循环论证”,有必要澄清两者之间的关系。研究方法:在马克思主义理论与实际相结合的框架下。这是一项定性研究。结果:从逻辑层面上看,异化劳动是本质,私有财产只是一种现象,即异化劳动是私有财产产生的原因,否则结论不成立。从现实的角度看,两者是互动关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信