Exploring the Variability in Antibacterial Testing of Resin Dental Composites among Investigators: A Narrative Review

IF 2.1 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Ashlesha Pal, Noorulain Altaf, Anum Mahmood, Shazia Akbar, Nazrah Maher, Naresh Kumar, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Laura Murcia, Ricardo E. Oñate-Sánchez
{"title":"Exploring the Variability in Antibacterial Testing of Resin Dental Composites among Investigators: A Narrative Review","authors":"Ashlesha Pal, Noorulain Altaf, Anum Mahmood, Shazia Akbar, Nazrah Maher, Naresh Kumar, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Laura Murcia, Ricardo E. Oñate-Sánchez","doi":"10.3390/microbiolres14040119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caries is a common dental problem brought on by factors like excessive sugar consumption, poor oral hygiene, and the presence of microorganisms in the mouth. This dental pathology is treated with a variety of filling materials, including tooth-colored direct resin dental composite (RDC), glass ionomer cement (GIC), and dental amalgam (also known as silver filling). RDC is the most preferred filling material in dental clinics due to its excellent esthetics and minimal tooth preparation, making it the need of the modern era. However, antimicrobial agents were added to this material in order to enhance its ability to prevent secondary caries. The antibacterial activity of RDC has been tested using a variety of methods, but testing protocols have been found to vary. Thusly, the point of this article is to examine the disparity in the strategy involved by specialists for testing the antibacterial properties of RDCs.","PeriodicalId":43788,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology Research","volume":"61 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caries is a common dental problem brought on by factors like excessive sugar consumption, poor oral hygiene, and the presence of microorganisms in the mouth. This dental pathology is treated with a variety of filling materials, including tooth-colored direct resin dental composite (RDC), glass ionomer cement (GIC), and dental amalgam (also known as silver filling). RDC is the most preferred filling material in dental clinics due to its excellent esthetics and minimal tooth preparation, making it the need of the modern era. However, antimicrobial agents were added to this material in order to enhance its ability to prevent secondary caries. The antibacterial activity of RDC has been tested using a variety of methods, but testing protocols have been found to vary. Thusly, the point of this article is to examine the disparity in the strategy involved by specialists for testing the antibacterial properties of RDCs.
在调查人员中探索树脂牙科复合材料抗菌测试的变异性:叙述综述
蛀牙是一种常见的牙齿问题,由摄入过多的糖、口腔卫生不良和口腔中存在微生物等因素引起。这种牙齿病变可以用各种填充物来治疗,包括牙色直接树脂牙科复合材料(RDC)、玻璃离子水合物(GIC)和牙科汞合金(也称为银填充物)。RDC因其优异的美观性和最少的牙齿准备而成为牙科诊所最首选的填充材料,使其成为现代时代的需要。然而,抗菌药物被添加到这种材料中,以提高其预防继发性龋齿的能力。RDC的抗菌活性已使用多种方法进行了测试,但测试方案各不相同。因此,本文的重点是检查专家测试rdc抗菌特性所涉及的策略的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology Research
Microbiology Research MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiology Research is an international, online-only, open access peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research, review articles, editorials, perspectives, case reports and brief reports to benefit researchers, microbiologists, physicians, veterinarians. Microbiology Research publishes ‘Clinic’ and ‘Research’ papers divided into two different skill and proficiency levels: ‘Junior’ and ‘Professional’. The aim of this four quadrant grid is to encourage younger researchers, physicians and veterinarians to submit their results even if their studies encompass just a limited set of observations or rely on basic statistical approach, yet upholding the customary sound approach of every scientific article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信