Language of Form, Form of Language, and the Poetic Christ

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Modern Theology Pub Date : 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1111/moth.12899
Olivier‐Thomas Venard
{"title":"Language of Form, Form of Language, and the Poetic Christ","authors":"Olivier‐Thomas Venard","doi":"10.1111/moth.12899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay begins with a phenomenological outline of the interchangeability of the terms ‘form’ and ‘matter’, and the transitivity of their relationship in metaphysics and aesthetics, when placed in the context of linguistic deconstruction. It then argues for an operative, rather than resultative, approach to ‘form’, pointing out that in a created cosmos created minds only ever approach substantial (metaphysical) forms by making use of language, i.e. by inventing linguistic forms. From there, the argument turns to the special language of the Scriptures, when read both in their historical relativity and as vehicles of the transcendent divine Word, and explores the analogy between the paradoxes of the matter‐form pair and several features of the Scriptures, such as the Möbius strip‐like enunciative structure, in which human and divine voices are reciprocally interwoven. Christ, the principle of the unity of the divine and human voices of the Scriptures, appears as the source of all the analogical instances of the transitivity and reversibility of form‐matter duality. Even more profoundly than his restoration of the signum , Christ re‐establishes ‘form’ in its interaction with ‘matter’.","PeriodicalId":18945,"journal":{"name":"Modern Theology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This essay begins with a phenomenological outline of the interchangeability of the terms ‘form’ and ‘matter’, and the transitivity of their relationship in metaphysics and aesthetics, when placed in the context of linguistic deconstruction. It then argues for an operative, rather than resultative, approach to ‘form’, pointing out that in a created cosmos created minds only ever approach substantial (metaphysical) forms by making use of language, i.e. by inventing linguistic forms. From there, the argument turns to the special language of the Scriptures, when read both in their historical relativity and as vehicles of the transcendent divine Word, and explores the analogy between the paradoxes of the matter‐form pair and several features of the Scriptures, such as the Möbius strip‐like enunciative structure, in which human and divine voices are reciprocally interwoven. Christ, the principle of the unity of the divine and human voices of the Scriptures, appears as the source of all the analogical instances of the transitivity and reversibility of form‐matter duality. Even more profoundly than his restoration of the signum , Christ re‐establishes ‘form’ in its interaction with ‘matter’.
形式的语言,语言的形式,和诗意的基督
本文首先从现象学的角度概述了“形式”和“物质”这两个术语的互换性,以及它们在形而上学和美学中的关系的及物性,当置于语言解构的背景下。然后,它论证了一种操作而非结果的“形式”方法,指出在一个被创造的宇宙中,被创造的心灵只会通过使用语言来接近实质(形而上学)形式,即通过发明语言形式。从那里,争论转向圣经的特殊语言,当阅读它们的历史相对性和作为超验的神圣话语的载体时,并探讨了物质-形式对的悖论和圣经的几个特征之间的类比,例如Möbius条状的发音结构,其中人类和神圣的声音相互交织。基督,圣经中神的声音和人的声音统一的原则,似乎是所有形式-物质二元性的及物性和可逆性的类比实例的来源。甚至比他对符号的恢复更深刻的是,基督在与“物质”的互动中重新建立了“形式”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Theology
Modern Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信