The Depoliticization of Ecology: Discourse Analysis of Land Conflict in Punclut, North Bandung Region

Kirana Mahdiah Sulaeman, Fadiyah Matni Nurdini, Mustabsyirotul Ummah Mustofa
{"title":"The Depoliticization of Ecology: Discourse Analysis of Land Conflict in Punclut, North Bandung Region","authors":"Kirana Mahdiah Sulaeman, Fadiyah Matni Nurdini, Mustabsyirotul Ummah Mustofa","doi":"10.15294/ipsr.v8i1.42591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the narrative and discourse in the conflict over land use in Punclut, Pagerwangi, North Bandung Region. The local community has managed the water catchment area of the North Bandung area for several decades before coming into conflict with the property company PT DAM which obtained a building permit from the government. Departing from Garet Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons, this research explores the causes of natural degradation in Punclut through a discourse on natural resource control by two warring parties: residents and the government. A qualitative approach with discourse analysis is used to answer research questions using data from interviews, mass media, journal articles, and official documents. The findings of this study are that Hardin's solution to the destruction of natural resources needs to be revised to answer the conditions in Punclut, where there is a local community with sociocultural rules and rationality to manage natural resources with ecological awareness. This community offers an alternative political discourse regarding environmental management: \"depoliticization of ecology\" and participatory conservation. However, the government and companies' discourse on welfare and economic progress always dominates the discourse in the decision-making process.","PeriodicalId":53373,"journal":{"name":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v8i1.42591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study discusses the narrative and discourse in the conflict over land use in Punclut, Pagerwangi, North Bandung Region. The local community has managed the water catchment area of the North Bandung area for several decades before coming into conflict with the property company PT DAM which obtained a building permit from the government. Departing from Garet Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons, this research explores the causes of natural degradation in Punclut through a discourse on natural resource control by two warring parties: residents and the government. A qualitative approach with discourse analysis is used to answer research questions using data from interviews, mass media, journal articles, and official documents. The findings of this study are that Hardin's solution to the destruction of natural resources needs to be revised to answer the conditions in Punclut, where there is a local community with sociocultural rules and rationality to manage natural resources with ecological awareness. This community offers an alternative political discourse regarding environmental management: "depoliticization of ecology" and participatory conservation. However, the government and companies' discourse on welfare and economic progress always dominates the discourse in the decision-making process.
生态学的非政治化:北万隆地区Punclut土地冲突的话语分析
本研究探讨北万隆地区彭克拉特、帕格万吉的土地使用冲突中的叙事与话语。当地社区管理北万隆地区的集水区已有几十年,之后与房地产公司PT DAM发生冲突,该公司获得了政府的建筑许可。本研究从加雷特·哈丁的《公地悲剧》出发,通过对居民和政府这两个交战方对自然资源控制的论述,探讨了Punclut自然退化的原因。本文采用定性的话语分析方法,通过访谈、大众媒体、期刊文章和官方文件中的数据来回答研究问题。本研究的发现是,哈丁对自然资源破坏的解决方案需要修改,以回答Punclut的条件,那里有一个具有社会文化规则和理性的当地社区,以生态意识管理自然资源。这个社区提供了关于环境管理的另一种政治话语:“生态的非政治化”和参与性保护。然而,在决策过程中,政府和企业关于福利和经济进步的话语总是占据主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信