CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES OF LAW AND DIGITALIZATION: CASE STUDY OF CONTRACT LAW

Q4 Social Sciences
Armand Krasniqi, Mersiha Kalac Kacamakovic
{"title":"CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES OF LAW AND DIGITALIZATION: CASE STUDY OF CONTRACT LAW","authors":"Armand Krasniqi, Mersiha Kalac Kacamakovic","doi":"10.21554/hrr.092308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on highlighting the weaknesses and lack of legislation for the electronic notarization of electronic contracts, not only in Kosovo’s business field. The idea of electronic notarization is new in Kosovo and is considered a complex task for the regulation of contractual obligations, which condition the modern activities of e-business. The dynamics and dimensions of e-business development strongly influence the change in the techniques of concluding formal contracts at a distance through information technologies. New legislative practices in the modern world are successfully managing to eliminate or reduce these obstacles, which unintentionally complicate and slow down contractual legal relations between business partners. Notary services are no exception to this trend. Despite the positive trend, the legislation in Kosovo seems to be only in its beginnings, and as such it does not enable and guarantee business partners the electronic notarization of contracts, but unfortunately, there is no debate and no concrete initiatives so far. The first phase, which would better regulate this field, concerns the standardization through the validation of these contracts in the territory of Kosovo through criteria that prove and guarantee the accuracy of the contract.","PeriodicalId":32121,"journal":{"name":"Human Research in Rehabilitation","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Research in Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focuses on highlighting the weaknesses and lack of legislation for the electronic notarization of electronic contracts, not only in Kosovo’s business field. The idea of electronic notarization is new in Kosovo and is considered a complex task for the regulation of contractual obligations, which condition the modern activities of e-business. The dynamics and dimensions of e-business development strongly influence the change in the techniques of concluding formal contracts at a distance through information technologies. New legislative practices in the modern world are successfully managing to eliminate or reduce these obstacles, which unintentionally complicate and slow down contractual legal relations between business partners. Notary services are no exception to this trend. Despite the positive trend, the legislation in Kosovo seems to be only in its beginnings, and as such it does not enable and guarantee business partners the electronic notarization of contracts, but unfortunately, there is no debate and no concrete initiatives so far. The first phase, which would better regulate this field, concerns the standardization through the validation of these contracts in the territory of Kosovo through criteria that prove and guarantee the accuracy of the contract.
法律与数字化的挑战与展望:合同法案例研究
本文着重强调了电子合同电子公证立法的不足和缺失,不仅在科索沃的商业领域。电子公证在科索沃是一个新概念,被认为是规范合同义务的一项复杂任务,而合同义务是现代电子商务活动的条件。电子商务发展的动态和规模强烈地影响着通过信息技术远距离签订正式合同的技术的变化。现代世界新的立法实践正在成功地设法消除或减少这些障碍,这些障碍无意中使商业伙伴之间的合同法律关系复杂化和缓慢化。公证服务也不例外。尽管有积极的趋势,但科索沃的立法似乎才刚刚开始,因此它不能使商业伙伴能够并保证合同的电子公证,但不幸的是,迄今没有辩论,也没有具体的倡议。第一阶段将更好地规范这一领域,涉及通过在科索沃领土内通过证明和保证合同准确性的标准对这些合同进行验证,从而实现标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Research in Rehabilitation
Human Research in Rehabilitation Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信