Rebuilding Authority in “Lumpen” Communities: The Need for Basic Income to Foster Entitlement

IF 0.5 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Matthew Thomas Johnson
{"title":"Rebuilding Authority in “Lumpen” Communities: The Need for Basic Income to Foster Entitlement","authors":"Matthew Thomas Johnson","doi":"10.1515/culture-2022-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents an immanent critique of neoliberal welfare reform using observation of participatory research involving left-behind communities in the North East of England and Australia. It argues that harms, such as passivity, invoked to reduce social security and increase conditionality are actually enhanced by austerity, conditionality and philanthropic giving. Deploying Mauss’ conception of the gift suggests that aggressive, conditional giving, combined with consumption through indebtedness, has served to strip individuals of authority. This leads to a radical conclusion: the stated aims of policy platforms like Big Society can only be realized through statutory entitlements like basic income.","PeriodicalId":41385,"journal":{"name":"Open Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2022-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article presents an immanent critique of neoliberal welfare reform using observation of participatory research involving left-behind communities in the North East of England and Australia. It argues that harms, such as passivity, invoked to reduce social security and increase conditionality are actually enhanced by austerity, conditionality and philanthropic giving. Deploying Mauss’ conception of the gift suggests that aggressive, conditional giving, combined with consumption through indebtedness, has served to strip individuals of authority. This leads to a radical conclusion: the stated aims of policy platforms like Big Society can only be realized through statutory entitlements like basic income.
在“贫民窟”社区重建权威:基本收入促进权利的必要性
摘要本文通过对英格兰东北部和澳大利亚留守社区参与性研究的观察,提出了对新自由主义福利改革的内在批判。它认为,为了减少社会保障和增加条件限制而援引的被动等危害,实际上会因紧缩、条件限制和慈善捐赠而加剧。采用莫斯的礼物概念表明,激进的、有条件的捐赠,加上通过负债进行的消费,已经剥夺了个人的权威。这导致了一个激进的结论:像“大社会”这样的政策平台的既定目标只能通过基本收入等法定权利来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Cultural Studies
Open Cultural Studies CULTURAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信