Racial bias in media coverage: accounting for structural position and public interest

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Eran Shor, Arnout van de Rijt
{"title":"Racial bias in media coverage: accounting for structural position and public interest","authors":"Eran Shor, Arnout van de Rijt","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcad031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Is media coverage racially biased? Past studies documenting differences in the quantity of coverage are small scale or anecdotal. In this article, we investigate whether Blacks receive less coverage than Whites who have reached similarly prominent positions and enjoy similar public interest. We analysed 200 million newspaper references in English-language media to about 32,000 prominent Black and White individuals, predominantly US born. The results do not support the bias hypothesis: Blacks overall receive systematically more coverage than Whites in comparable structural positions and their coverage is on par with that of select Whites who attract equal public interest.","PeriodicalId":48237,"journal":{"name":"European Sociological Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Is media coverage racially biased? Past studies documenting differences in the quantity of coverage are small scale or anecdotal. In this article, we investigate whether Blacks receive less coverage than Whites who have reached similarly prominent positions and enjoy similar public interest. We analysed 200 million newspaper references in English-language media to about 32,000 prominent Black and White individuals, predominantly US born. The results do not support the bias hypothesis: Blacks overall receive systematically more coverage than Whites in comparable structural positions and their coverage is on par with that of select Whites who attract equal public interest.
媒体报道中的种族偏见:结构地位和公众利益的解释
媒体报道有种族偏见吗?过去记录覆盖数量差异的研究是小规模的或轶事性的。在这篇文章中,我们调查了黑人是否比白人得到的报道少,而白人也达到了同样的突出地位,并享有同样的公共利益。我们分析了2亿份英文媒体的报纸引用,涉及约3.2万名杰出的黑人和白人,主要是美国出生的人。结果不支持偏见假设:在类似的结构职位上,黑人总体上比白人获得了更多的系统性报道,他们的报道与那些吸引同样公众兴趣的特定白人的报道相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: European Sociological Review contains articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信