Complex thinking in the history of economic thought: aspects of economic complexity from ancient times to modernity, with the case of evolutionary-institutional economics and with policy implications

Q3 Social Sciences
Wolfram Elsner
{"title":"Complex thinking in the history of economic thought: aspects of economic complexity from ancient times to modernity, with the case of evolutionary-institutional economics and with policy implications","authors":"Wolfram Elsner","doi":"10.1504/ijpp.2023.133612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We highlight a number of examples of complex thinking from ancient times to the current edge. We refer the earlier complexity perspectives to the cutting-edge understanding of complex adaptive (economic) systems. This illustrates that simplistic (neoclassical) equilibrium thinking is a big exemption rather than the 'normal' in HET. Since the 1980s, the mathematical, statistical, data, and computational resources have been fully developed and in fact successfully combined to finally demonstrate that complexity economics is the way of doing realistic and scientific economics, in contrast to reductionist and simplistic equilibrium modelling. We illustrate the potential of such scientific real-world economics with an example from evolutionary-institutional economics, and we consider modern policy implications of such complex economic thinking.","PeriodicalId":35027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Policy","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpp.2023.133612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We highlight a number of examples of complex thinking from ancient times to the current edge. We refer the earlier complexity perspectives to the cutting-edge understanding of complex adaptive (economic) systems. This illustrates that simplistic (neoclassical) equilibrium thinking is a big exemption rather than the 'normal' in HET. Since the 1980s, the mathematical, statistical, data, and computational resources have been fully developed and in fact successfully combined to finally demonstrate that complexity economics is the way of doing realistic and scientific economics, in contrast to reductionist and simplistic equilibrium modelling. We illustrate the potential of such scientific real-world economics with an example from evolutionary-institutional economics, and we consider modern policy implications of such complex economic thinking.
经济思想史上的复杂思维:从古代到现代经济复杂性的各个方面,以进化制度经济学为例及其政策含义
我们突出了一些从古代到现代的复杂思维的例子。我们将早期的复杂性观点引用到对复杂适应性(经济)系统的前沿理解。这说明,简单的(新古典主义)均衡思维是一个很大的豁免,而不是HET的“正常”。自20世纪80年代以来,数学、统计、数据和计算资源得到了充分的发展,并且实际上成功地结合在一起,最终证明了复杂性经济学是做现实和科学经济学的方式,而不是简化主义和简单的均衡模型。我们用进化制度经济学的一个例子来说明这种科学的现实世界经济学的潜力,并考虑这种复杂经济思维的现代政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Policy
International Journal of Public Policy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The IJPP proposes and fosters discussion on public policy issues facing nation states and national and supranational organisations, including governments, and how these diverse groups approach and solve common public policy problems. The emphasis will be on governance, accountability, the creation of wealth and wellbeing, and the implications policy choices have on nation states and their citizens. This perspective acknowledges that public policy choice and execution is complex and has ramifications on the welfare of citizens; and that, despite national differences, the actions of nation states are constrained by policies determined by supranational bodies, some of which are not directly accountable to any international body.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信