“Frankly, My Dear, I Just Might Give a damn:” An Experiment Investigating Preexisting Beliefs and Reasons to Watch Romantic Comedies on Reports of Beliefs, Mood, and Enjoyment

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Veronica Hefner
{"title":"“Frankly, My Dear, I Just Might Give a damn:” An Experiment Investigating Preexisting Beliefs and Reasons to Watch Romantic Comedies on Reports of Beliefs, Mood, and Enjoyment","authors":"Veronica Hefner","doi":"10.1080/1041794x.2023.2265672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis multiple message, pretest-posttest control group design experiment investigated whether different motivations to view romantic comedies and preexisting romantic beliefs (e.g. love conquers all, soulmate) influenced mood, enjoyment, and romantic beliefs. Results of 358 undergraduate participants demonstrate that romantic beliefs prior to viewing predicted reduced beliefs after viewing a challenge film, and greater enjoyment after viewing an ideal film. Watching in order to learn or be entertained led to stronger romantic beliefs in the ideal condition, whereas watching for entertainment led to more enjoyment and a more positive mood than did watching for other reasons, regardless of the content. Sheer viewing led to stronger romantic beliefs in the ideal condition.Keywords: Experimentmotivations to viewmoviesrelationship beliefsromantic idealsuses and gratifications theory AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to acknowledge Emily O’Connor, Jourdan Thompson, Madison Price, Reed Maday, Carly Greer, Lorraine Dangor, Gregory Johnson, and Jamie Ricklin for their contributions to this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46274,"journal":{"name":"Southern Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2023.2265672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis multiple message, pretest-posttest control group design experiment investigated whether different motivations to view romantic comedies and preexisting romantic beliefs (e.g. love conquers all, soulmate) influenced mood, enjoyment, and romantic beliefs. Results of 358 undergraduate participants demonstrate that romantic beliefs prior to viewing predicted reduced beliefs after viewing a challenge film, and greater enjoyment after viewing an ideal film. Watching in order to learn or be entertained led to stronger romantic beliefs in the ideal condition, whereas watching for entertainment led to more enjoyment and a more positive mood than did watching for other reasons, regardless of the content. Sheer viewing led to stronger romantic beliefs in the ideal condition.Keywords: Experimentmotivations to viewmoviesrelationship beliefsromantic idealsuses and gratifications theory AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to acknowledge Emily O’Connor, Jourdan Thompson, Madison Price, Reed Maday, Carly Greer, Lorraine Dangor, Gregory Johnson, and Jamie Ricklin for their contributions to this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
“坦率地说,亲爱的,我可能会在乎:”一项研究先前存在的信仰和观看浪漫喜剧的原因的实验,研究了信仰、情绪和享受的报告
摘要本实验采用多信息、前测后测的控制组设计,研究观看浪漫喜剧的不同动机和已有的浪漫信仰(如爱征服一切、灵魂伴侣)是否会影响情绪、享受和浪漫信仰。358名大学生参与者的研究结果表明,观看挑战电影前的浪漫信念预示着观看挑战电影后的信念会降低,而观看理想电影后的快乐程度会提高。在理想情况下,为了学习或娱乐而观看会导致更强烈的浪漫信念,而为了娱乐而观看会比为了其他原因而观看带来更多的享受和更积极的情绪,无论内容如何。在理想状态下,纯粹的观看会导致更强烈的浪漫信念。关键字:实验动机观电影关系信念浪漫理想与满足理论致谢作者要感谢Emily O 'Connor, Jourdan Thompson, Madison Price, Reed Maday, Carly Greer, Lorraine Dangor, Gregory Johnson和Jamie Ricklin对这个项目的贡献。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信