Text-based Patient – Doctor Discourse Online And Patients’ Experiences of Empathy

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Silja Martikainen, Laura Kohonen-Aho, Niina Seittenranta, Emilia Makkonen, Mari Falcon, Valtteri Wikström, Katri Saarikivi
{"title":"Text-based Patient – Doctor Discourse Online And Patients’ Experiences of Empathy","authors":"Silja Martikainen, Laura Kohonen-Aho, Niina Seittenranta, Emilia Makkonen, Mari Falcon, Valtteri Wikström, Katri Saarikivi","doi":"10.1007/s10606-023-09481-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Empathic responding matters in face-to-face medical consultations. We have previously shown that patients' perceptions of doctor empathy also support positive experiences at an online clinic. However, there is still little knowledge about what types of communication influence patients’ online experiences of empathy. In this study we investigated text-based patient-doctor discourse at an online clinic using an adaptation of the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Our aims were 1) to assess the reliability of the adapted RIAS 2) to investigate what characteristics are common during the text-based consultations and 3) to examine how the doctor’s discourse relates to the patients’ experience of empathy online. Based on the inter-rater reliability analyses the conversational clusters of Social ( ρ = 0.950), Biomedical ( ρ = 0.939), and Technology related talk ( ρ = 0.833), Procedural statements ( ρ = 0.693) and Agreement ( ρ = 0.687) were rated with acceptable reliability. Biomedical topics were most common in both patients’ and doctors’ communication. Patients’ experience of doctors’ empathy was positively correlated with the amount of doctor’s psychosocial talk and procedural statements although the effect sizes were small ( ρ < 0.30 for all models). These results encourage the use of personal talk and giving clear instructions to patients about the care process at a text-based online clinic focusing on brief consultations.","PeriodicalId":51008,"journal":{"name":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-023-09481-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Empathic responding matters in face-to-face medical consultations. We have previously shown that patients' perceptions of doctor empathy also support positive experiences at an online clinic. However, there is still little knowledge about what types of communication influence patients’ online experiences of empathy. In this study we investigated text-based patient-doctor discourse at an online clinic using an adaptation of the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Our aims were 1) to assess the reliability of the adapted RIAS 2) to investigate what characteristics are common during the text-based consultations and 3) to examine how the doctor’s discourse relates to the patients’ experience of empathy online. Based on the inter-rater reliability analyses the conversational clusters of Social ( ρ = 0.950), Biomedical ( ρ = 0.939), and Technology related talk ( ρ = 0.833), Procedural statements ( ρ = 0.693) and Agreement ( ρ = 0.687) were rated with acceptable reliability. Biomedical topics were most common in both patients’ and doctors’ communication. Patients’ experience of doctors’ empathy was positively correlated with the amount of doctor’s psychosocial talk and procedural statements although the effect sizes were small ( ρ < 0.30 for all models). These results encourage the use of personal talk and giving clear instructions to patients about the care process at a text-based online clinic focusing on brief consultations.
基于文本的在线医患话语与患者共情体验
移情反应在面对面医疗咨询中的作用。我们之前的研究表明,患者对医生同理心的感知也支持在线诊所的积极体验。然而,对于哪些类型的沟通会影响患者的在线共情体验,我们仍然知之甚少。在本研究中,我们使用Roter交互分析系统(RIAS)对在线诊所中基于文本的医患对话进行了调查。我们的目的是:1)评估改编后的RIAS的可靠性;2)调查在基于文本的咨询中常见的特征;3)检查医生的话语与患者在线共情体验之间的关系。基于信度分析,社会(ρ = 0.950)、生物医学(ρ = 0.939)和技术相关谈话(ρ = 0.833)、程序性陈述(ρ = 0.693)和一致性(ρ = 0.687)的会话簇被评为可接受信度。在医患双方的交流中,生物医学话题最为常见。患者对医生共情的体验与医生的心理社会谈话和程序陈述的数量呈正相关,尽管效应量很小(ρ <所有型号为0.30)。这些结果鼓励使用个人谈话,并在以简短咨询为重点的基于文本的在线诊所中向患者提供关于护理过程的明确指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing
Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices is devoted to innovative research in computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). It provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the debate and exchange of ideas concerning theoretical, practical, technical, and social issues in CSCW. The CSCW Journal arose in response to the growing interest in the design, implementation and use of technical systems (including computing, information, and communications technologies) which support people working cooperatively, and its scope remains to encompass the multifarious aspects of research within CSCW and related areas. The CSCW Journal focuses on research oriented towards the development of collaborative computing technologies on the basis of studies of actual cooperative work practices (where ‘work’ is used in the wider sense). That is, it welcomes in particular submissions that (a) report on findings from ethnographic or similar kinds of in-depth fieldwork of work practices with a view to their technological implications, (b) report on empirical evaluations of the use of extant or novel technical solutions under real-world conditions, and/or (c) develop technical or conceptual frameworks for practice-oriented computing research based on previous fieldwork and evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信