World Medievalism: The Middle Ages in Modern Textual Culture by Louise D’Arcens (review)

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Hillary Cheramie
{"title":"World Medievalism: The Middle Ages in Modern Textual Culture by Louise D’Arcens (review)","authors":"Hillary Cheramie","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: World Medievalism: The Middle Ages in Modern Textual Culture by Louise D’Arcens Hillary Cheramie Louise D’Arcens, World Medievalism: The Middle Ages in Modern Textual Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021), 201 pp. Louise D’Arcens’s thorough investigation of medievalism beyond European chronology provides a timely model for reframing how scholars can attentively engage the “Middle Ages.” Drawing from a rich and diverse archive, D’Arcens masterfully unpacks the capacity of the Middle Ages to conjure contradictions. By carefully illuminating these contradictions and holding them aloft, she creates a framework to analyze how medievalism can at once bolster and displace the legacies of nationalism, racism, and colonialism. World Medievalism is poised to query the many developments of the global turn in medieval studies over the last twenty years and forge a path toward ethically making a world capacious enough for spatial and temporal localizations that resist Euro-Anglo hierarchies. The world, D’Arcens argues, can transcend the globe’s teleology because it can encompass the “transhistorical experiential state” of medievalism (22). This phenomenological aspect can be constructed sensorily, as it is at a heritage tourism site, or imaginatively, as it is in the world of a novel. In each of her four case studies, D’Arcens analyzes the contradictions and tensions of the transhistorical experience of medievalism. The first half of the book examines the use of the Middle Ages in the Northern Hemisphere to in one instance attempt to maintain Eurocentric legacies, and in the other instance displace Eurocentric legacies with interculturalism. The book’s second half is concerned with medievalisms that have emerged from the Global South, specifically the Asia-Pacific region. These medievalisms illuminate the possibilities and pitfalls of the transtemporal straddling of premodernity. The first chapter focuses on how right-wing French nationalism uses medievalism in reaction to identity crises spurred on by threatening globalization. D’Arcens’s selection of novels is astute in that each demonstrates the different contradictions arising from French nationalist medievalism. The thread that binds them together is déclinisme, a sense that in a teleological societal progression France is worsening, which manifests on the Right as melancholy for lost imperialism. Jérôme Ferrari’s Sermon on the Fall of Rome (Le Sermon sur la chute de Rome, 2012) aligns post-Roman France and post-colonial Corsica and, D’Arcens argues, imagines that a neomedieval future will develop from this power vacuum. Michel Houellebecq’s Submission (Soumission, 2015) satirizes [End Page 221] concerns of a neomedieval future in his depiction of France on the eve of becoming an Islamic polity. D’Arcens shows how medievalism is invoked to “disorient” clichéd antagonism between Europe and Islam and ridicule the contradiction inherent to the Islamophobic Right’s traditionalism. The chapter closes with a novel that similarly struggles with “the contradictory role of the Middle Ages as both the origin and the fulfillment” of national identity (71). D’Arcens unravels the blind “dis-orientalism” at the core of Mathias Enard’s Compass (La Boussole, 2015) (60). Rather than merely apologize for orientalism, the novel grapples with the legacy of East-West relations, inflected by the Crusades, and how to proceed in those relations given the resultant uneven distribution of power and resources. Chapter 2 turns toward the reorientation of medievalism in Tariq Ali’s Islam Quintet and hones the “world” of World Medievalism here to “diasporic Arab-Islamicate fiction” (76). Ali’s novels create and populate historical worlds that refuse the hierarchies of Western chronology and cartography, offering an alternative to the exclusion of Arab knowledge and the misinterpretation and flattening of Islam. By drawing attention to Tariq Ali’s contemporary politics and activism, D’Arcens situates the Islam Quintet as a meditation on modern East-West relations. The Quintet reclaims time and geography for hope—for a Middle Ages that have not been foreclosed by Latin Christendom. The convivencia that runs throughout Ali’s novels offers hope for the future that is particularly welcome, D’Arcens highlights, following the first chapter on déclinisme and melancholy. Set in late fifteenth-century Muslim al-Andalus, Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree (1992) combats the notion of Islamic fanaticism by...","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: World Medievalism: The Middle Ages in Modern Textual Culture by Louise D’Arcens Hillary Cheramie Louise D’Arcens, World Medievalism: The Middle Ages in Modern Textual Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021), 201 pp. Louise D’Arcens’s thorough investigation of medievalism beyond European chronology provides a timely model for reframing how scholars can attentively engage the “Middle Ages.” Drawing from a rich and diverse archive, D’Arcens masterfully unpacks the capacity of the Middle Ages to conjure contradictions. By carefully illuminating these contradictions and holding them aloft, she creates a framework to analyze how medievalism can at once bolster and displace the legacies of nationalism, racism, and colonialism. World Medievalism is poised to query the many developments of the global turn in medieval studies over the last twenty years and forge a path toward ethically making a world capacious enough for spatial and temporal localizations that resist Euro-Anglo hierarchies. The world, D’Arcens argues, can transcend the globe’s teleology because it can encompass the “transhistorical experiential state” of medievalism (22). This phenomenological aspect can be constructed sensorily, as it is at a heritage tourism site, or imaginatively, as it is in the world of a novel. In each of her four case studies, D’Arcens analyzes the contradictions and tensions of the transhistorical experience of medievalism. The first half of the book examines the use of the Middle Ages in the Northern Hemisphere to in one instance attempt to maintain Eurocentric legacies, and in the other instance displace Eurocentric legacies with interculturalism. The book’s second half is concerned with medievalisms that have emerged from the Global South, specifically the Asia-Pacific region. These medievalisms illuminate the possibilities and pitfalls of the transtemporal straddling of premodernity. The first chapter focuses on how right-wing French nationalism uses medievalism in reaction to identity crises spurred on by threatening globalization. D’Arcens’s selection of novels is astute in that each demonstrates the different contradictions arising from French nationalist medievalism. The thread that binds them together is déclinisme, a sense that in a teleological societal progression France is worsening, which manifests on the Right as melancholy for lost imperialism. Jérôme Ferrari’s Sermon on the Fall of Rome (Le Sermon sur la chute de Rome, 2012) aligns post-Roman France and post-colonial Corsica and, D’Arcens argues, imagines that a neomedieval future will develop from this power vacuum. Michel Houellebecq’s Submission (Soumission, 2015) satirizes [End Page 221] concerns of a neomedieval future in his depiction of France on the eve of becoming an Islamic polity. D’Arcens shows how medievalism is invoked to “disorient” clichéd antagonism between Europe and Islam and ridicule the contradiction inherent to the Islamophobic Right’s traditionalism. The chapter closes with a novel that similarly struggles with “the contradictory role of the Middle Ages as both the origin and the fulfillment” of national identity (71). D’Arcens unravels the blind “dis-orientalism” at the core of Mathias Enard’s Compass (La Boussole, 2015) (60). Rather than merely apologize for orientalism, the novel grapples with the legacy of East-West relations, inflected by the Crusades, and how to proceed in those relations given the resultant uneven distribution of power and resources. Chapter 2 turns toward the reorientation of medievalism in Tariq Ali’s Islam Quintet and hones the “world” of World Medievalism here to “diasporic Arab-Islamicate fiction” (76). Ali’s novels create and populate historical worlds that refuse the hierarchies of Western chronology and cartography, offering an alternative to the exclusion of Arab knowledge and the misinterpretation and flattening of Islam. By drawing attention to Tariq Ali’s contemporary politics and activism, D’Arcens situates the Islam Quintet as a meditation on modern East-West relations. The Quintet reclaims time and geography for hope—for a Middle Ages that have not been foreclosed by Latin Christendom. The convivencia that runs throughout Ali’s novels offers hope for the future that is particularly welcome, D’Arcens highlights, following the first chapter on déclinisme and melancholy. Set in late fifteenth-century Muslim al-Andalus, Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree (1992) combats the notion of Islamic fanaticism by...
《世界中世纪:现代文本文化中的中世纪》作者:路易丝·达森
回顾:世界中世纪:中世纪在现代文本文化由路易丝·达森希拉里·谢拉米路易丝·达森,世界中世纪:中世纪在现代文本文化(纽约:牛津大学出版社,2021年),201页。路易丝·达森的中世纪超越欧洲年代学的彻底调查提供了一个及时的模型,重构学者如何能够专心从事“中世纪。”从丰富多样的档案中,达森巧妙地揭示了中世纪制造矛盾的能力。通过仔细阐释这些矛盾,并将其高举起来,她创建了一个框架来分析中世纪主义是如何同时支持和取代民族主义、种族主义和殖民主义的遗产的。世界中世纪主义准备对过去二十年来中世纪研究的全球转向的许多发展提出质疑,并在伦理上开辟一条道路,使世界足够宽敞,可以进行空间和时间的本地化,从而抵制欧洲-盎格鲁等级制度。阿森认为,世界可以超越全球的目的论,因为它可以包含中世纪主义的“超历史经验状态”(22)。这种现象学方面可以感性地构建,就像在遗产旅游景点一样,也可以想象,就像在小说的世界里一样。在她的四个案例研究中,德阿森分析了中世纪超历史经验的矛盾和紧张。本书的前半部分考察了在北半球使用中世纪,一方面试图维持欧洲中心主义的遗产,另一方面用跨文化主义取代欧洲中心主义的遗产。这本书的后半部分关注的是来自全球南方,特别是亚太地区的中世纪。这些中世纪主义揭示了前现代性跨时期跨越的可能性和陷阱。第一章主要讨论法国右翼民族主义如何利用中世纪主义来应对全球化威胁引发的身份危机。阿森的小说选集是精明的,因为每一部小说都展示了法国民族主义中世纪产生的不同矛盾。把他们联系在一起的是一种悲观情绪,在目的论的社会进步中,法国正在恶化,这在右翼表现为对失落的帝国主义的忧郁。Jérôme法拉利的《罗马陷落的布道》(Le Sermon sur la chute de Rome, 2012)将后罗马时代的法国和后殖民时代的科西嘉结合在一起,达森认为,新中世纪的未来将从这种权力真空中发展出来。米歇尔·维勒贝克(Michel Houellebecq)的《提交》(Soumission, 2015)在描述法国成为伊斯兰政体前夕,讽刺了人们对新中世纪未来的担忧。达森展示了中世纪主义是如何被用来“迷惑”欧洲与伊斯兰教之间的陈腐对立,并嘲笑伊斯兰恐惧症右翼传统主义固有的矛盾。这一章以一部小说结束,这部小说同样挣扎于“中世纪作为民族认同的起源和实现的矛盾角色”(71)。D’arcens揭示了Mathias Enard’s Compass (La Boussole, 2015)核心的盲目的“反东方主义”(60)。这部小说不仅仅是为东方主义道歉,它还探讨了受十字军东征影响的东西方关系的遗留问题,以及在权力和资源分配不均的情况下,如何在这种关系中继续发展。第二章转向塔里克·阿里的《伊斯兰五重奏》中中世纪主义的重新定位,并将世界中世纪主义的“世界”归结为“流散的阿拉伯-伊斯兰小说”(76)。阿里的小说创造并填充了拒绝西方年表和制图等级制的历史世界,为排除阿拉伯知识和对伊斯兰教的误解和扁平化提供了另一种选择。通过关注塔里克·阿里的当代政治和激进主义,阿森斯将《伊斯兰五重奏》定位为对现代东西方关系的思考。《五重奏》重新唤起了时间和地理上的希望——一个没有被拉丁基督教世界剥夺权利的中世纪。阿森强调,贯穿阿里小说的便利为未来提供了希望,这尤其受欢迎,紧随第一章关于抑郁和忧郁。《石榴树的阴影》(1992)以15世纪晚期的穆斯林安达卢斯为背景,通过……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies publishes articles by graduate students and recent PhDs in any field of medieval and Renaissance studies. The journal maintains a tradition of gathering work from across disciplines, with a special interest in articles that have an interdisciplinary or cross-cultural scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信