‘The same Alexey Tried...’: Historical Concept of the First Book of the Novel Peter the Great by A.N. Tolstoy in the Assessment of Soviet Criticism

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Anna S. Akimova
{"title":"‘The same Alexey Tried...’: Historical Concept of the First Book of the Novel Peter the Great by A.N. Tolstoy in the Assessment of Soviet Criticism","authors":"Anna S. Akimova","doi":"10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-326-338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research bases on reviews of Soviet critics collected and systematized for the first time on the works of A.N. Tolstoy dedicated to the Peter’s I epoch such as the story Peter’s Day (1918) and the play On the Rack (1929). These works directly related to the idea of the novel Peter the Great. As shown in the periodical press reviews of the play, as well as of the performance, soon to be staged by the Moscow Art Theater 2 (1929), their perception determined the tone of the papers dedicated to the first book of the novel Peter the Great (1930). The study provides an overview of all six reviews written by Boris Valbe, Gerge Gorbachev, Cornelii Zelinsky, Nikolai Jesuitov et al., and outlines their main provisions and comments. The main drawback, according to critics, was the lack of a Marxist understanding of history in the novel reflected in the selection of historical sources and facts and in the image of the main character, Peter I. Assessing the chronicle order of the composition of the work differently everyone noted the colorful language, cheery humor and dialogues. The reviews of 1931 shaped the main approaches to the evaluation of the novel which will be developed in 1935 after the release of the second book through the concept of a lonely ruler, historical parallelism, i. e. solving the issues of modernity based on the Peter’s epoch, reflection in the novel of the role of “trading capital”. The study of the reception of the first book by A.N. Tolstoy will allows us determining its role and significance in the historical and cultural context as well as — more broadly — considering the main approaches to the evaluation of the historical novels and the representation of images of historical figures in Soviet culture.","PeriodicalId":41255,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-326-338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research bases on reviews of Soviet critics collected and systematized for the first time on the works of A.N. Tolstoy dedicated to the Peter’s I epoch such as the story Peter’s Day (1918) and the play On the Rack (1929). These works directly related to the idea of the novel Peter the Great. As shown in the periodical press reviews of the play, as well as of the performance, soon to be staged by the Moscow Art Theater 2 (1929), their perception determined the tone of the papers dedicated to the first book of the novel Peter the Great (1930). The study provides an overview of all six reviews written by Boris Valbe, Gerge Gorbachev, Cornelii Zelinsky, Nikolai Jesuitov et al., and outlines their main provisions and comments. The main drawback, according to critics, was the lack of a Marxist understanding of history in the novel reflected in the selection of historical sources and facts and in the image of the main character, Peter I. Assessing the chronicle order of the composition of the work differently everyone noted the colorful language, cheery humor and dialogues. The reviews of 1931 shaped the main approaches to the evaluation of the novel which will be developed in 1935 after the release of the second book through the concept of a lonely ruler, historical parallelism, i. e. solving the issues of modernity based on the Peter’s epoch, reflection in the novel of the role of “trading capital”. The study of the reception of the first book by A.N. Tolstoy will allows us determining its role and significance in the historical and cultural context as well as — more broadly — considering the main approaches to the evaluation of the historical novels and the representation of images of historical figures in Soviet culture.
“同一个阿列克谢……——《苏联批评评价》中托尔斯泰小说《彼得大帝》第一部的历史概念
这项研究基于苏联评论家的评论,首次收集并系统化了A.N.托尔斯泰献给彼得时代的作品,如故事《彼得的一天》(1918)和戏剧《在架子上》(1929)。这些作品与小说《彼得大帝》的思想直接相关。正如即将由莫斯科第二艺术剧院(1929)上演的戏剧和演出的定期新闻评论所显示的那样,他们的看法决定了专门为小说《彼得大帝》(1930)的第一本书撰写的论文的基调。该研究概述了Boris Valbe、Gerge Gorbachev、Cornelii Zelinsky、Nikolai Jesuitov等人撰写的所有六篇评论,并概述了他们的主要条款和评论。根据评论家的说法,主要的缺点是小说中缺乏马克思主义的历史观,这反映在对历史资料和事实的选择上,也反映在主人公彼得·i的形象上。每个人都以不同的方式评价这部作品的编年顺序,每个人都注意到它丰富多彩的语言、欢快的幽默和对话。1931年的评论形成了小说评价的主要方法,并将在1935年第二本书出版后通过孤独统治者的概念发展,历史平行,即解决基于彼得时代的现代性问题,在小说中反映“交易资本”的作用。对托尔斯泰第一部作品的接受的研究将使我们能够确定它在历史和文化背景下的作用和意义,以及更广泛地考虑苏联文化中历史小说评价和历史人物形象表现的主要方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信