O Julgamento do habeas corpus nº. 333.195/MS pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça: pode o princípio da bagatela imprópria ser aplicado às infrações penais cometidas no âmbito da Lei nº. 11.340/06 (Lei Maria da Penha), caso ocorra a reconciliação posterior do casal?
{"title":"O Julgamento do habeas corpus nº. 333.195/MS pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça: pode o princípio da bagatela imprópria ser aplicado às infrações penais cometidas no âmbito da Lei nº. 11.340/06 (Lei Maria da Penha), caso ocorra a reconciliação posterior do casal?","authors":"Elenita Araújo e Silva Neta","doi":"10.29327/2193997.5.2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work has as its central problem the identification if the principle of improper bagatela can be applied to criminal offenses committed under Law No. 11.340/06, if the subsequent reconciliation of the couple occurs, according to the judgment of HC No. 333.195/MS by the Superior Court of Justice. Therefore, the objective of the article is to analyze whether the reconciliation of the couple would be an authorizing requirement that allows the incidence of this principle or not. Thus, a deductive method was used (starting from a general analysis of the theme, with the study of the Maria da Penha Law to later deal with the judgment of the aforementioned habeas corpus filed by the Public Defender's Office of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul) and the main works of the authors who deal with the theme, such as Luigi Ferrajoli and Roberto Barroso.","PeriodicalId":34528,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/2193997.5.2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The work has as its central problem the identification if the principle of improper bagatela can be applied to criminal offenses committed under Law No. 11.340/06, if the subsequent reconciliation of the couple occurs, according to the judgment of HC No. 333.195/MS by the Superior Court of Justice. Therefore, the objective of the article is to analyze whether the reconciliation of the couple would be an authorizing requirement that allows the incidence of this principle or not. Thus, a deductive method was used (starting from a general analysis of the theme, with the study of the Maria da Penha Law to later deal with the judgment of the aforementioned habeas corpus filed by the Public Defender's Office of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul) and the main works of the authors who deal with the theme, such as Luigi Ferrajoli and Roberto Barroso.
审判于2008年10月15日开始,并于2008年10月15日结束。333.195/MS由高等法院:不正当行为原则是否适用于根据第333.195/MS号法律所犯的刑事罪行?11.340/06 (Maria da Penha law),如果夫妻随后和解?
这项工作的中心问题是,根据高等法院第333.195/MS号最高法院的判决,确定是否可以将不当离婚原则适用于根据第11.340/06号法律所犯的刑事犯罪,如果夫妇随后和解。因此,本文的目的是分析夫妻的和解是否会成为允许这一原则发生的授权要求。因此,采用了演绎的方法(从对主题的一般分析开始,通过对Maria da Penha法的研究,后来处理上述由南马托格罗索州公设辩护人办公室提出的人身保护令的判决)和处理主题的作者的主要作品,如Luigi Ferrajoli和Roberto Barroso。