Gravação ambiental clandestina e sua dissonância no bojo do contencioso eleitoral perante entendimento do Supremo Tribunal Federal

Geovanna Sotero Corcinio, Alana Maria Passos Barreto
{"title":"Gravação ambiental clandestina e sua dissonância no bojo do contencioso eleitoral perante entendimento do Supremo Tribunal Federal","authors":"Geovanna Sotero Corcinio, Alana Maria Passos Barreto","doi":"10.29327/2193997.5.2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work aims to promote the analysis of the main aspects that involve the theme clandestine environmental recordings as a means of proof in the Electoral Criminal Process. Initially, we seek to examine the theme by specifying the audiovisual evidence and their differences, emphasizing the procedure of clandestine recordings, object of the work. A continuous act, the line of changes of understanding of this theme over the years is exposed, until the current jurisprudential consolidation by the Supreme Court. Soon after, the work focuses on the development in the electoral area, especially the jurisprudential oscillation even with the position established by the Supreme Court in Extraordinary Appeal 583,937 Rio de Janeiro, demonstrating the main points of controversy as a basis in the jurisprudence of the Superior Electoral Court. Finally, the last topic addresses the change in the positioning of the TSE, going back on the illegality of clandestine environmental recording.","PeriodicalId":34528,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/2193997.5.2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work aims to promote the analysis of the main aspects that involve the theme clandestine environmental recordings as a means of proof in the Electoral Criminal Process. Initially, we seek to examine the theme by specifying the audiovisual evidence and their differences, emphasizing the procedure of clandestine recordings, object of the work. A continuous act, the line of changes of understanding of this theme over the years is exposed, until the current jurisprudential consolidation by the Supreme Court. Soon after, the work focuses on the development in the electoral area, especially the jurisprudential oscillation even with the position established by the Supreme Court in Extraordinary Appeal 583,937 Rio de Janeiro, demonstrating the main points of controversy as a basis in the jurisprudence of the Superior Electoral Court. Finally, the last topic addresses the change in the positioning of the TSE, going back on the illegality of clandestine environmental recording.
在最高法院的理解下,秘密的环境记录及其在选举争议中的不和谐
本工作的目的是促进对涉及在选举刑事程序中作为证明手段的秘密环境录音这一主题的主要方面的分析。最初,我们试图通过指定视听证据及其差异来检查主题,强调秘密录音的程序,这是工作的对象。一个连续的行为,多年来对这一主题认识的变化就暴露无遗,直到目前由最高法院进行法理巩固。不久之后,工作集中于选举领域的发展,特别是与最高法院在里约热内卢的第583,937号特别上诉中确立的立场相一致的法理上的波动,表明了作为高级选举法院法理基础的争议要点。最后,最后一个主题涉及TSE定位的变化,回到秘密环境记录的非法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信