Getting Around to It: How Design Science Researchers Set Future Work Agendas

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
João Barata, Paulo Rupino da Cunha
{"title":"Getting Around to It: How Design Science Researchers Set Future Work Agendas","authors":"João Barata, Paulo Rupino da Cunha","doi":"10.17705/1pais.15302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: There is a long tradition of writing about future work in research papers, and information systems design science research (IS DSR) is no exception. However, there is a lack of studies on (1) how IS DSR authors currently envision the next steps for their work and (2) guidelines to improve the communication of opportunities to accumulate knowledge. Method: This paper contributes to this topic, building on a systematic literature review of 123 IS DSR papers published between 2018 and 2022. Results: Design-oriented research requires the research team to decide which tasks to carry out immediately in building the future and which to postpone as research debt. The paper's contribution is threefold. First, we propose a research debt lifecycle to support (1) project stakeholders, (2) IS DSR community, and (3) societies looking for better futures. Second, we discuss the anatomy of future work in recent IS DSR. Finally, we suggest guidelines to manage and report the next research steps. Conclusion: This paper presents a pioneering assessment of future work suggestions in the IS field, focusing on the design science research paradigm. Future work directions emerge from researchers' choices during the IS DSR process that must be continuously managed.","PeriodicalId":43480,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.15302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: There is a long tradition of writing about future work in research papers, and information systems design science research (IS DSR) is no exception. However, there is a lack of studies on (1) how IS DSR authors currently envision the next steps for their work and (2) guidelines to improve the communication of opportunities to accumulate knowledge. Method: This paper contributes to this topic, building on a systematic literature review of 123 IS DSR papers published between 2018 and 2022. Results: Design-oriented research requires the research team to decide which tasks to carry out immediately in building the future and which to postpone as research debt. The paper's contribution is threefold. First, we propose a research debt lifecycle to support (1) project stakeholders, (2) IS DSR community, and (3) societies looking for better futures. Second, we discuss the anatomy of future work in recent IS DSR. Finally, we suggest guidelines to manage and report the next research steps. Conclusion: This paper presents a pioneering assessment of future work suggestions in the IS field, focusing on the design science research paradigm. Future work directions emerge from researchers' choices during the IS DSR process that must be continuously managed.
绕开它:设计科学研究人员如何设定未来的工作议程
摘要背景:在研究论文中描述未来工作有悠久的传统,信息系统设计科学研究(is DSR)也不例外。然而,缺乏以下方面的研究:(1)is DSR作者目前如何设想他们工作的下一步;(2)改善知识积累机会交流的指导方针。方法:本文在对2018年至2022年发表的123篇IS DSR论文进行系统文献综述的基础上,对这一主题做出了贡献。结果:以设计为导向的研究需要研究团队决定哪些任务在建设未来时立即进行,哪些任务作为研究债务推迟进行。这份报纸的贡献有三方面。首先,我们提出了一个研究债务生命周期来支持(1)项目利益相关者,(2)IS DSR社区,以及(3)寻找更好未来的社会。其次,我们讨论了近期IS DSR的未来工作解剖。最后,我们提出指导方针,以管理和报告下一步的研究步骤。结论:本文对IS领域未来的工作建议进行了开创性的评估,重点关注设计科学的研究范式。未来的工作方向来自研究人员在IS DSR过程中的选择,必须持续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信