Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy with Bladder Neck-Sparing Technique

Narmina Khanmammadova, Jacob Basilius, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Christian Im, Caroline Nguyen, Mohammed Shahait, David I. Lee
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy with Bladder Neck-Sparing Technique","authors":"Narmina Khanmammadova, Jacob Basilius, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Christian Im, Caroline Nguyen, Mohammed Shahait, David I. Lee","doi":"10.1089/vid.2023.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign tumor in men in the United States and one of the most common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms.1 Several modalities are utilized to manage BPH surgically including vaporization, laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP), and open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). RASP is endorsed by American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines for patients with large (>100 mL) and very large prostates (>150 mL) as it has favorable outcomes including low perioperative morbidity rates, blood loss, transfusion rates, and short recovery time.2–4 The learning curve is significantly shorter with RASP compared to LEP.4,5 RASP can also be utilized with same-day discharge pathway reducing the cost of care and healthcare burden. Here we describe our bladder-neck sparing technique for RASP with emphasis on intraoperative technical aspects to hasten the recovery and avoid the use of continuous bladder irrigation. Methods: Data were prospectively recorded from 24 patients who underwent outpatient RASP from September 2021 to March 2023 following the IRB approval. Patient demographics, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were collected. All patients followed an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Results: The mean age was 71.5 ± 7.8 years, mean body mass index was 28.8 ± 4.5 kg/m2, median preoperative Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 5.9 (3.1–11) ng/mL, median preoperative AUA score was 20 (13.5–28.25), and 9 patients (37.5%) were in retention, median prostate size was 135 (101.5–158) mL, mean operative time was 138.3 ± 39.8 minutes, mean console time was 78 ± 20.1 minutes, estimated blood loss was 100 (50–100) mL, median weight of the removed specimen was 72.4 (47.1–95.1) mL, median hospital stay was 157 (116.5–180) minutes, median length of catheterization was 7-days. There were no perioperative complications, blood transfusions, conversions to open, or need for continuous bladder irrigation. Twenty-one (87.5%) patients were discharged home on the day of surgery. The median pain score at discharge time reported by 15 patients was 3 (0–5). Only 3 (25%) of 12 patients reporting on pain management needed to use opioids. All patients were able to urinate after the catheter removal. One patient was readmitted for blood clot retention due to strenuous exercise at 3-weeks postoperatively (Clavien Dindo class II). Incidental cancer (Gleason Score 3+3) was found in one patient (4.2%) who is now managed by monitoring the PSA levels every 3 months. The median postoperative 3-month PSA was 0.8 (0.48–1.65) ng/mL. Twenty patients reported their postoperative 3-month urinary continence status, and all of them were continent. The median postoperative 3-month AUA score reported by 15 patients was 5 (3–11). Only one patient needed reintervention postoperatively due to slowing of the urinary stream as he had a urethral mucosal flap from preoperative catheter injury. Conclusions: Outpatient RASP is safe with the described technique and is an excellent option for men with enlarged prostates while also eliminating routine hospital stays. No competing financial interests exist. Patient Consent Statement: Author(s) have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of the video recording of the procedure. Runtime of video: 8 mins 15 secs","PeriodicalId":92974,"journal":{"name":"Videourology (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videourology (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vid.2023.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign tumor in men in the United States and one of the most common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms.1 Several modalities are utilized to manage BPH surgically including vaporization, laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP), and open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). RASP is endorsed by American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines for patients with large (>100 mL) and very large prostates (>150 mL) as it has favorable outcomes including low perioperative morbidity rates, blood loss, transfusion rates, and short recovery time.2–4 The learning curve is significantly shorter with RASP compared to LEP.4,5 RASP can also be utilized with same-day discharge pathway reducing the cost of care and healthcare burden. Here we describe our bladder-neck sparing technique for RASP with emphasis on intraoperative technical aspects to hasten the recovery and avoid the use of continuous bladder irrigation. Methods: Data were prospectively recorded from 24 patients who underwent outpatient RASP from September 2021 to March 2023 following the IRB approval. Patient demographics, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were collected. All patients followed an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Results: The mean age was 71.5 ± 7.8 years, mean body mass index was 28.8 ± 4.5 kg/m2, median preoperative Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 5.9 (3.1–11) ng/mL, median preoperative AUA score was 20 (13.5–28.25), and 9 patients (37.5%) were in retention, median prostate size was 135 (101.5–158) mL, mean operative time was 138.3 ± 39.8 minutes, mean console time was 78 ± 20.1 minutes, estimated blood loss was 100 (50–100) mL, median weight of the removed specimen was 72.4 (47.1–95.1) mL, median hospital stay was 157 (116.5–180) minutes, median length of catheterization was 7-days. There were no perioperative complications, blood transfusions, conversions to open, or need for continuous bladder irrigation. Twenty-one (87.5%) patients were discharged home on the day of surgery. The median pain score at discharge time reported by 15 patients was 3 (0–5). Only 3 (25%) of 12 patients reporting on pain management needed to use opioids. All patients were able to urinate after the catheter removal. One patient was readmitted for blood clot retention due to strenuous exercise at 3-weeks postoperatively (Clavien Dindo class II). Incidental cancer (Gleason Score 3+3) was found in one patient (4.2%) who is now managed by monitoring the PSA levels every 3 months. The median postoperative 3-month PSA was 0.8 (0.48–1.65) ng/mL. Twenty patients reported their postoperative 3-month urinary continence status, and all of them were continent. The median postoperative 3-month AUA score reported by 15 patients was 5 (3–11). Only one patient needed reintervention postoperatively due to slowing of the urinary stream as he had a urethral mucosal flap from preoperative catheter injury. Conclusions: Outpatient RASP is safe with the described technique and is an excellent option for men with enlarged prostates while also eliminating routine hospital stays. No competing financial interests exist. Patient Consent Statement: Author(s) have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of the video recording of the procedure. Runtime of video: 8 mins 15 secs
机器人辅助简单前列腺切除术与膀胱颈部保留技术
简介:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是美国男性最常见的良性肿瘤,也是引起下尿路症状最常见的原因之一有几种治疗前列腺增生的手术方法,包括蒸发、激光前列腺摘除(LEP)、开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助的简单前列腺切除术(RASP)。RASP被美国泌尿学会(AUA)指南认可用于大前列腺(>100 mL)和超大前列腺(>150 mL)患者,因为它具有良好的预后,包括围手术期发病率低、失血少、输血率低、恢复时间短。2-4与lep相比,RASP的学习曲线明显缩短。4,5 RASP也可以与当日出院途径一起使用,降低了护理成本和医疗负担。在这里,我们描述了RASP的膀胱颈保留技术,重点是术中技术方面,以加速恢复,避免使用持续的膀胱冲洗。方法:在IRB批准后,从2021年9月到2023年3月,前瞻性地记录了24例门诊RASP患者的数据。收集患者人口统计资料、术前、围手术期和术后结果。所有患者术后均恢复良好。结果:平均年龄为71.5±7.8年,平均身体质量指数为28.8±4.5 kg / m2,平均术前前列腺特异抗原(PSA)为5.9 (3.1 -11)ng / mL,术前AUA得分中值为20(13.5 - -28.25),在保留9例(37.5%),中位数前列腺大小是135毫升(101.5 -158),平均手术时间为138.3±39.8分钟,平均控制台时间是78±20.1分钟,估计失血是100毫升(50 - 100),切除标本的平均重量是72.4毫升(47.1 - -95.1),中位住院时间为157(116.5 ~ 180)分钟,中位置管时间为7天。无围手术期并发症、输血、转开或持续膀胱冲洗。21例(87.5%)患者于手术当日出院。15例患者出院时疼痛评分中位数为3分(0-5分)。报告疼痛管理的12名患者中只有3名(25%)需要使用阿片类药物。所有患者在拔管后均能排尿。1例患者术后3周因剧烈运动导致血凝块潴留再次入院(Clavien Dindo II级)。1例患者(4.2%)发现偶发癌(Gleason评分3+3),现在每3个月监测PSA水平。术后3个月中位PSA为0.8 (0.48-1.65)ng/mL。20例患者报告术后3个月尿失禁情况,均为尿失禁。15例患者报告的术后3个月AUA评分中位数为5(3-11)。只有1例患者因术前导管损伤造成尿道黏膜瓣,导致尿流减慢,术后需要再次干预。结论:门诊RASP采用上述技术是安全的,对于前列腺肥大的男性来说是一个很好的选择,同时也减少了常规的住院时间。不存在相互竞争的经济利益。患者同意声明:作者已收到并存档患者同意,以便在视频录制过程之前进行视频录制/发布。影片时长:8分15秒
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信