The Predicament of Practical Reason

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1017/s1369415423000201

Jakob Huber

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract According to Lea Ypi, Kant’s attempt in the first Critique to unify reason via the practical route fails because his notion of purposiveness as design commits him to a dogmatic metaphysics. I challenge this claim on two grounds. First, I argue that practical reason does not have an interest in a strong modal connection that guarantees the unity of freedom and nature rather than a weak modal connection that merely affirms the possibility of our ends. Second, I highlight that the epistemic status of practical ideas is one of faith or hope rather than knowledge. Hence, Kant’s attempt to unify reason via the practical route can be reconstructed in a way that is largely in line with the commitments of his critical philosophy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

实践理性的困境

伊皮认为，康德在《第一批判》中试图通过实践路线统一理性的尝试失败了，因为他的目的性即设计的概念使他陷入了教条主义的形而上学。我从两个方面质疑这种说法。首先，我认为实践理性对保证自由和自然统一的强模态联系不感兴趣，而对仅仅肯定我们的目的的可能性的弱模态联系不感兴趣。其次，我强调实用观念的认识论地位是一种信仰或希望，而不是知识。因此，康德通过实践路线统一理性的尝试可以在很大程度上与他的批判哲学的承诺相一致的方式进行重构。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.