Procedural Justice, Perceived Legitimacy, and Reoffending Behavior: In Police and Court Setting

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Matthias van Hall, Anja J. E. Dirkzwager, Peter H. Van der Laan, Paul Nieuwbeerta
{"title":"Procedural Justice, Perceived Legitimacy, and Reoffending Behavior: In Police and Court Setting","authors":"Matthias van Hall, Anja J. E. Dirkzwager, Peter H. Van der Laan, Paul Nieuwbeerta","doi":"10.1177/00938548231206833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing body of procedural justice research studying individuals involved in the criminal justice system, this strand of literature has used different approaches to measure procedural justice and legitimacy. The present study assesses the different theoretical assumptions of these approaches across two criminal justice settings, namely, policing and courts. In addition, we examine how procedural justice stemming from interactions with police officers and judges is related to legitimacy and reoffending behavior postrelease. Using data on adult detainees who entered Dutch pretrial detention centers, our findings support the theoretical assumptions regarding procedural justice and felt obligation to obey the law in both criminal justice settings. Furthermore, path analyses show that perceptions of procedural justice arising from encounters with police officers and judges are related to a higher sense of obligation to obey the law, which in turn is associated with a lower risk of reoffending.","PeriodicalId":48287,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing body of procedural justice research studying individuals involved in the criminal justice system, this strand of literature has used different approaches to measure procedural justice and legitimacy. The present study assesses the different theoretical assumptions of these approaches across two criminal justice settings, namely, policing and courts. In addition, we examine how procedural justice stemming from interactions with police officers and judges is related to legitimacy and reoffending behavior postrelease. Using data on adult detainees who entered Dutch pretrial detention centers, our findings support the theoretical assumptions regarding procedural justice and felt obligation to obey the law in both criminal justice settings. Furthermore, path analyses show that perceptions of procedural justice arising from encounters with police officers and judges are related to a higher sense of obligation to obey the law, which in turn is associated with a lower risk of reoffending.
程序正义、感知合法性和再犯行为:在警察和法院设置
尽管越来越多的程序正义研究对象是涉及刑事司法系统的个人,但这一领域的文献使用了不同的方法来衡量程序正义和合法性。本研究评估了这些方法在两种刑事司法环境下的不同理论假设,即警察和法院。此外,我们还研究了与警察和法官互动产生的程序正义如何与合法性和释放后的再犯罪行为相关。使用进入荷兰审前拘留中心的成年被拘留者的数据,我们的研究结果支持关于程序正义的理论假设,并在刑事司法环境中感到有义务遵守法律。此外,路径分析表明,与警察和法官接触时产生的程序正义观念与更高的守法义务感有关,而守法义务感又与较低的再犯风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice and Behavior publishes articles examining psychological and behavioral aspects of the juvenile and criminal justice systems. The concepts "criminal justice" and "behavior" should be interpreted broadly to include analyses of etiology of delinquent or criminal behavior, the process of law violation, victimology, offender classification and treatment, deterrence, and incapacitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信