Accuracy of machine learning models using ultrasound images in prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Retta Catherina Sihotang, Claudio Agustino, Ficky Huang, Dyandra Parikesit, Fakhri Rahman, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy Hamid
{"title":"Accuracy of machine learning models using ultrasound images in prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review","authors":"Retta Catherina Sihotang, Claudio Agustino, Ficky Huang, Dyandra Parikesit, Fakhri Rahman, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy Hamid","doi":"10.13181/mji.oa.236765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND In prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, many developed machine learning (ML) models using ultrasound images show good accuracy. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of neural network ML models in PCa diagnosis using ultrasound images.
 METHODS The protocol was registered with PROSPERO registration number CRD42021277309. Three reviewers independently conducted a literature search in 5 online databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Proquest, ScienceDirect, and Scopus). We included all cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies in English, that used neural networks ML models for PCa diagnosis in humans. Conference/review articles and studies with combination examination with magnetic resonance imaging or had no diagnostic parameters were excluded.
 RESULTS Of 391 titles and abstracts screened, 9 articles relevant to the study were included. Risk of bias analysis was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. Of the 9 articles, 5 used artificial neural networks, 1 used deep learning, 1 used recurrent neural networks, and 2 used convolutional neural networks. The included articles showed a varied area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76–0.98. Factors affecting the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) were the AI model, mode and type of transrectal sonography, Gleason grading, and prostate-specific antigen level.
 CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of neural network ML models in PCa diagnosis using ultrasound images was relatively high, with an AUC value above 0.7. Thus, this modality is promising for PCa diagnosis that can provide instant information for further workup and help doctors decide whether to perform a prostate biopsy.","PeriodicalId":18302,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.236765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, many developed machine learning (ML) models using ultrasound images show good accuracy. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of neural network ML models in PCa diagnosis using ultrasound images. METHODS The protocol was registered with PROSPERO registration number CRD42021277309. Three reviewers independently conducted a literature search in 5 online databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Proquest, ScienceDirect, and Scopus). We included all cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies in English, that used neural networks ML models for PCa diagnosis in humans. Conference/review articles and studies with combination examination with magnetic resonance imaging or had no diagnostic parameters were excluded. RESULTS Of 391 titles and abstracts screened, 9 articles relevant to the study were included. Risk of bias analysis was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. Of the 9 articles, 5 used artificial neural networks, 1 used deep learning, 1 used recurrent neural networks, and 2 used convolutional neural networks. The included articles showed a varied area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76–0.98. Factors affecting the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) were the AI model, mode and type of transrectal sonography, Gleason grading, and prostate-specific antigen level. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of neural network ML models in PCa diagnosis using ultrasound images was relatively high, with an AUC value above 0.7. Thus, this modality is promising for PCa diagnosis that can provide instant information for further workup and help doctors decide whether to perform a prostate biopsy.
使用超声图像诊断前列腺癌的机器学习模型的准确性:系统综述
在前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断中,许多使用超声图像的机器学习(ML)模型显示出良好的准确性。本研究旨在分析神经网络ML模型在超声图像诊断前列腺癌中的准确性。 方法该方案注册为PROSPERO注册号CRD42021277309。三位审稿人独立地在5个在线数据库(PubMed、EBSCO、Proquest、ScienceDirect和Scopus)中进行了文献检索。我们纳入了所有使用神经网络ML模型进行人类PCa诊断的英语队列、病例对照和横断面研究。会议/综述文章和有磁共振成像联合检查或无诊断参数的研究被排除。 结果在筛选的391篇标题和摘要中,纳入9篇与本研究相关的文章。使用QUADAS-2工具进行偏倚风险分析。在这9篇文章中,5篇使用人工神经网络,1篇使用深度学习,1篇使用递归神经网络,2篇使用卷积神经网络。纳入的文献显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76 ~ 0.98。影响人工智能(AI)准确性的因素有:人工智能模型、经直肠超声模式和类型、Gleason分级、前列腺特异性抗原水平。 结论神经网络ML模型用于超声图像诊断PCa的准确率较高,AUC值在0.7以上。因此,这种模式对于前列腺癌的诊断是有希望的,它可以为进一步的检查提供即时信息,并帮助医生决定是否进行前列腺活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Indonesia
Medical Journal of Indonesia MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Journal of Indonesia is a peer-reviewed and open access journal that focuses on promoting medical sciences generated from basic sciences, clinical, and community or public health research to integrate researches in all aspects of human health. This journal publishes original articles, reviews, and also interesting case reports. Brief communications containing short features of medicine, latest developments in diagnostic procedures, treatment, or other health issues that is important for the development of health care system are also acceptable. Letters and commentaries of our published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信