Nneoma Okeke , Luke B. Snell , Balram Rathish , Amal Hussein , William Newsholme , Damien Mack , Aodhan Breathnach , Jonathan A. Otter
{"title":"Evaluating the dynamics of hospital COVID-19 contacts and subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study","authors":"Nneoma Okeke , Luke B. Snell , Balram Rathish , Amal Hussein , William Newsholme , Damien Mack , Aodhan Breathnach , Jonathan A. Otter","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated the dynamics of COVID-19 contacts subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an inpatient setting across three National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. 9.2% (476/5,156) COVID-19 contacts met inclusion criteria, were typable and tested positive for COVID-19. There was no significant difference between Omicron and non-Omicron contacts overall conversion proportions. Omicron contacts converted faster than non-Omicron contacts (median 3 days vs 4 days, <em>P</em>=0.03), and had significantly greater proportions of early conversions at day 3, 5, and 7 timepoints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000586/pdfft?md5=53c2a97ce5d0d78e82bdd0dee09f4496&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088923000586-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the dynamics of COVID-19 contacts subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an inpatient setting across three National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. 9.2% (476/5,156) COVID-19 contacts met inclusion criteria, were typable and tested positive for COVID-19. There was no significant difference between Omicron and non-Omicron contacts overall conversion proportions. Omicron contacts converted faster than non-Omicron contacts (median 3 days vs 4 days, P=0.03), and had significantly greater proportions of early conversions at day 3, 5, and 7 timepoints.