Informing Visual Display Design of Electronic Health Records: A Human Factors Cross-Industry Perspective

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Zoe M. Pruitt, Jessica L. Howe, Lucy S. Bocknek, Arianna P. Milicia, Patricia A. Spaar, Seth Krevat, Raj M. Ratwani
{"title":"Informing Visual Display Design of Electronic Health Records: A Human Factors Cross-Industry Perspective","authors":"Zoe M. Pruitt, Jessica L. Howe, Lucy S. Bocknek, Arianna P. Milicia, Patricia A. Spaar, Seth Krevat, Raj M. Ratwani","doi":"10.33940/001c.77769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite their prevalence, poorly designed electronic health records (EHRs) are common, and research shows poor design consequences include clinician burnout, diagnostic error, and even patient harm. One of the major difficulties of EHR design is the visual display of information, which aims to present information in an easily digestible form for the user. High-risk industries like aviation, automotive, and nuclear have guidelines for visual displays based on human factors principles for optimized design. Purpose In this study, we reviewed the visual display guidelines from three high-risk industries—automotive, aviation, nuclear—for their applicability to EHR design and safety. Methods Human factors experts extracted guidelines related to visual displays from automotive, aviation, and nuclear human factors guideline documents. Human factors experts and a clinical expert excluded guidelines irrelevant to EHR. Human factors experts used a modified reflexive thematic analysis to group guidelines into meaningful topics. Disagreements were discussed until a consensus was reached. Results A total of 449 guidelines were extracted from the industry documents, and 283 (63.0%) were deemed relevant to EHRs. By industry, 12 of 44 (27.3%) automotive industry guidelines were relevant, 43 of 115 (37.4%) aviation industry guidelines were relevant, and 228 of 290 (78.6%) nuclear industry guidelines were relevant. Guidelines were grouped into six categories: alphanumeric; color, brightness, contrast, and luminance; comprehension; design characteristics; symbols, pictograms, and icons; and tables, figures, charts, and lists. Conclusion Our analysis identified visual display guidelines organized around six topics from the automotive, aviation, and nuclear industries to inform EHR design. Multiple stakeholders, including EHR vendors, healthcare facilities, and policymakers, can apply these guidelines to design new EHRs and optimize EHRs already in use.","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/001c.77769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Despite their prevalence, poorly designed electronic health records (EHRs) are common, and research shows poor design consequences include clinician burnout, diagnostic error, and even patient harm. One of the major difficulties of EHR design is the visual display of information, which aims to present information in an easily digestible form for the user. High-risk industries like aviation, automotive, and nuclear have guidelines for visual displays based on human factors principles for optimized design. Purpose In this study, we reviewed the visual display guidelines from three high-risk industries—automotive, aviation, nuclear—for their applicability to EHR design and safety. Methods Human factors experts extracted guidelines related to visual displays from automotive, aviation, and nuclear human factors guideline documents. Human factors experts and a clinical expert excluded guidelines irrelevant to EHR. Human factors experts used a modified reflexive thematic analysis to group guidelines into meaningful topics. Disagreements were discussed until a consensus was reached. Results A total of 449 guidelines were extracted from the industry documents, and 283 (63.0%) were deemed relevant to EHRs. By industry, 12 of 44 (27.3%) automotive industry guidelines were relevant, 43 of 115 (37.4%) aviation industry guidelines were relevant, and 228 of 290 (78.6%) nuclear industry guidelines were relevant. Guidelines were grouped into six categories: alphanumeric; color, brightness, contrast, and luminance; comprehension; design characteristics; symbols, pictograms, and icons; and tables, figures, charts, and lists. Conclusion Our analysis identified visual display guidelines organized around six topics from the automotive, aviation, and nuclear industries to inform EHR design. Multiple stakeholders, including EHR vendors, healthcare facilities, and policymakers, can apply these guidelines to design new EHRs and optimize EHRs already in use.
电子健康档案的视觉显示设计:人因跨行业视角
尽管电子健康记录(EHRs)很流行,但设计不良的电子健康记录(EHRs)很常见,研究表明,设计不良的后果包括临床医生的职业倦怠、诊断错误,甚至病人的伤害。电子病历设计的主要困难之一是信息的可视化显示,其目的是将信息以易于理解的形式呈现给用户。航空、汽车和核能等高风险行业都有基于人为因素优化设计原则的视觉显示指导方针。目的本研究回顾汽车、航空、核能三个高风险行业的视觉显示指引,探讨其在电子病历设计及安全性上的适用性。方法人因专家从汽车、航空、核等领域的人因指南文件中提取视觉显示相关指南。人为因素专家和临床专家排除了与电子病历无关的指南。人为因素专家使用了一种改进的反身性主题分析,将准则分成有意义的主题。讨论分歧,直到达成一致意见。结果从行业文献中提取的指南共449条,其中283条(63.0%)被认为与电子病历相关。从行业来看,44个汽车行业指南中有12个(27.3%)是相关的,115个航空行业指南中有43个(37.4%)是相关的,290个核工业指南中有228个(78.6%)是相关的。指南分为六类:字母数字;颜色、亮度、对比度和亮度;理解;设计特点;符号、象形文字和图标;以及表格、图形、图表和列表。我们的分析确定了围绕汽车、航空和核工业的六个主题组织的视觉显示指南,以指导EHR设计。包括EHR供应商、医疗机构和政策制定者在内的多个利益相关者可以应用这些指导原则来设计新的EHR并优化已经在使用的EHR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信