Communicating in an Era of Polarization

Q3 Nursing
Sylvia Rowe, Nick Alexander
{"title":"Communicating in an Era of Polarization","authors":"Sylvia Rowe, Nick Alexander","doi":"10.1097/nt.0000000000000647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issues of scientific misinformation/disinformation, fake news, credibility of sources, and, generally, communicating in a time of social incivility, uncertainty, and declining public trust have been much discussed recently in the literature. Challenges around science communication are numerous and seemingly pervasive. Lately, those charged with reporting science around food, nutrition, and health have grappled with a larger and growing challenge—the increasing polarization of society, both in the United States and globally. In its latest Trust Barometer, Edelman, the New York–based public relations and marketing consultancy firm, detailed various effects of polarization on public trust of science and other societal institutions. In this article, the authors discuss health and nutrition science communication in the context of audience polarization. They build on their previously articulated guidance for communicators in addressing the added challenges to effective messaging in a politically and culturally polarized information environment.","PeriodicalId":19386,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Today","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nt.0000000000000647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Issues of scientific misinformation/disinformation, fake news, credibility of sources, and, generally, communicating in a time of social incivility, uncertainty, and declining public trust have been much discussed recently in the literature. Challenges around science communication are numerous and seemingly pervasive. Lately, those charged with reporting science around food, nutrition, and health have grappled with a larger and growing challenge—the increasing polarization of society, both in the United States and globally. In its latest Trust Barometer, Edelman, the New York–based public relations and marketing consultancy firm, detailed various effects of polarization on public trust of science and other societal institutions. In this article, the authors discuss health and nutrition science communication in the context of audience polarization. They build on their previously articulated guidance for communicators in addressing the added challenges to effective messaging in a politically and culturally polarized information environment.
两极分化时代的沟通
科学错误信息/虚假信息、假新闻、来源的可信度,以及在社会不文明、不确定性和公众信任下降的时代进行沟通的问题,最近在文献中得到了很多讨论。科学传播面临的挑战很多,而且似乎无处不在。最近,那些负责报道食品、营养和健康科学的人面临着一个越来越大的挑战——在美国和全球范围内,社会的两极分化日益加剧。总部位于纽约的公共关系和营销咨询公司爱德曼(Edelman)在其最新的“信任晴雨表”(Trust Barometer)中,详细介绍了两极分化对公众对科学和其他社会机构信任的各种影响。在本文中,作者讨论了受众两极分化背景下的健康与营养科学传播。在政治和文化两极化的信息环境中,有效信息传递所面临的额外挑战是这些指南的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Today
Nutrition Today Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: An established journal for over 40 years, Nutrition Today publishes articles by leading nutritionists and scientists who endorse scientifically sound food, diet and nutritional practices. It helps nutrition professionals clear a pathway through today"s maze of fad diets and cure-all claims. Lively review articles cover the most current and controversial topics, such as the role of dietary fiber in cancer, as well as news about people, meetings, and other events that affect the field. The journal features solicited and submitted original articles, reviews of nutrition research findings, and summaries of symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信