Resisting the inevitable: human rights and the data society

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
André Dao
{"title":"Resisting the inevitable: human rights and the data society","authors":"André Dao","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines a methodology for describing the encounter between human rights and digital data technologies. The methodology is orientated around a set of traditions within law and humanities scholarship—in particular, thinking critically and co-productively about human rights, as well as a concern with the plurality of law, and forms of authority. The aim of the methodology is to resist digital and human rights fatalism. It does so by producing descriptions that offer resources towards a better understanding of how certain visions of the future succeed, and how failed visions might be rearticulated.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrad012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article outlines a methodology for describing the encounter between human rights and digital data technologies. The methodology is orientated around a set of traditions within law and humanities scholarship—in particular, thinking critically and co-productively about human rights, as well as a concern with the plurality of law, and forms of authority. The aim of the methodology is to resist digital and human rights fatalism. It does so by producing descriptions that offer resources towards a better understanding of how certain visions of the future succeed, and how failed visions might be rearticulated.
抗拒不可避免:人权与数据社会
本文概述了一种描述人权与数字数据技术之间相遇的方法。该方法以法律和人文学术领域的一系列传统为导向,特别是对人权的批判性和建设性思考,以及对法律多元化和权威形式的关注。该方法的目的是抵制数字和人权宿命论。它通过提供描述来提供资源,以便更好地理解未来的某些愿景如何成功,以及如何重新阐述失败的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信