Evaluation of functional aerobic exercise capacity among chronic e-cigarette users compared to combustible cigarette smokers and non-smokers: a comparative study

Heba Ammar, Rania Hashish, Shrouk Mohamed Ali, Ahmed Salem, Abeer Hagras
{"title":"Evaluation of functional aerobic exercise capacity among chronic e-cigarette users compared to combustible cigarette smokers and non-smokers: a comparative study","authors":"Heba Ammar, Rania Hashish, Shrouk Mohamed Ali, Ahmed Salem, Abeer Hagras","doi":"10.1186/s43161-023-00154-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes have gained significant popularity as an alternative to traditional combustible tobacco smoking particularly among the youth. Although there is a growing prevalence of e-cigarette usage, the effects on cardiovascular function and physical capacity have not been adequately studied. The toxic products in combustible tobacco cigarettes negatively impact functional exercise capacity. However, the available data regarding the effect of e-cigarette use on functional exercise capacity are scarce. Thus, in the current study, we aimed to evaluate the functional aerobic exercise capacity among chronic e-cigarette users compared to combustible cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Results This comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted on 105 healthy volunteers. Participants were assigned into three study groups each consisting of 35 participants: chronic e-cigarette users, combustible cigarette smokers, and a non-smoker control group. Basal demographic and clinical data were similar in all groups. Mean heart rates and respiratory rates were significantly higher among e-cigarette smokers and combustible cigarette smokers compared to non-smoker controls ( p < 0.001). Chronic e-cigarette users and combustible cigarette smokers had shorter 6-MWT distances compared to non-smokers (508.3, 488, and 616.6 m, respectively, p < 0.001). Borg scale scores after performing the six-minute walking test were significantly higher in chronic e-cigarette users and combustible cigarette smokers groups compared to non-smokers, where perceived exertion (4.9, 5.5, 2.1, respectively, p < 0.001), dyspnea (5.7, 6.5, 0.1, respectively, p < 0.001) and leg fatigue (4.2, 5.4, 1.4, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion In this cross-sectional study, significant evidence demonstrates that e-cigarette use is not harmless. This was particularly presented in apparently healthy e-cigarette users in comparison to the healthy non-smoker control group. Chronic e-cigarette use is associated with reduced functional capacity compared to non-smoker controls. This was signified by decreased 6MWT walking distances, higher Borg scale scores, and lower oxygen saturation percentages among the chronic electronic cigarette users as compared to non-smoker controls after performing the six-minute walking test. All the evaluated parameters in the current study were similarly reduced among both the e-cigarette users group and the combustible cigarette smokers group compared to non-smokers with no statistically significant differences between both smoker groups.","PeriodicalId":34220,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43161-023-00154-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes have gained significant popularity as an alternative to traditional combustible tobacco smoking particularly among the youth. Although there is a growing prevalence of e-cigarette usage, the effects on cardiovascular function and physical capacity have not been adequately studied. The toxic products in combustible tobacco cigarettes negatively impact functional exercise capacity. However, the available data regarding the effect of e-cigarette use on functional exercise capacity are scarce. Thus, in the current study, we aimed to evaluate the functional aerobic exercise capacity among chronic e-cigarette users compared to combustible cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Results This comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted on 105 healthy volunteers. Participants were assigned into three study groups each consisting of 35 participants: chronic e-cigarette users, combustible cigarette smokers, and a non-smoker control group. Basal demographic and clinical data were similar in all groups. Mean heart rates and respiratory rates were significantly higher among e-cigarette smokers and combustible cigarette smokers compared to non-smoker controls ( p < 0.001). Chronic e-cigarette users and combustible cigarette smokers had shorter 6-MWT distances compared to non-smokers (508.3, 488, and 616.6 m, respectively, p < 0.001). Borg scale scores after performing the six-minute walking test were significantly higher in chronic e-cigarette users and combustible cigarette smokers groups compared to non-smokers, where perceived exertion (4.9, 5.5, 2.1, respectively, p < 0.001), dyspnea (5.7, 6.5, 0.1, respectively, p < 0.001) and leg fatigue (4.2, 5.4, 1.4, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion In this cross-sectional study, significant evidence demonstrates that e-cigarette use is not harmless. This was particularly presented in apparently healthy e-cigarette users in comparison to the healthy non-smoker control group. Chronic e-cigarette use is associated with reduced functional capacity compared to non-smoker controls. This was signified by decreased 6MWT walking distances, higher Borg scale scores, and lower oxygen saturation percentages among the chronic electronic cigarette users as compared to non-smoker controls after performing the six-minute walking test. All the evaluated parameters in the current study were similarly reduced among both the e-cigarette users group and the combustible cigarette smokers group compared to non-smokers with no statistically significant differences between both smoker groups.
评价慢性电子烟使用者与可燃香烟吸烟者和非吸烟者的功能性有氧运动能力:一项比较研究
电子烟或电子烟作为传统可燃烟草吸烟的替代品,特别是在年轻人中获得了显著的普及。尽管电子烟的使用越来越普遍,但对心血管功能和身体能力的影响尚未得到充分研究。可燃卷烟中的有毒物质对功能性运动能力产生负面影响。然而,关于电子烟使用对功能性运动能力的影响的现有数据很少。因此,在当前的研究中,我们旨在评估慢性电子烟使用者与可燃香烟吸烟者和非吸烟者相比的功能性有氧运动能力。结果对105名健康志愿者进行了横断面对比研究。参与者被分配到三个研究组,每个研究组由35人组成:长期电子烟使用者,可燃香烟吸烟者和不吸烟的对照组。各组的基本人口学和临床资料相似。与不吸烟的对照组相比,电子烟吸烟者和可燃香烟吸烟者的平均心率和呼吸频率明显更高(p <0.001)。与不吸烟者相比,长期电子烟使用者和可燃香烟吸烟者的6-MWT距离更短(分别为508.3米、488米和616.6米)。0.001)。在进行6分钟步行测试后,慢性电子烟使用者和可燃香烟吸烟者组的博格量表得分明显高于非吸烟者,后者的感知运动得分分别为4.9、5.5、2.1,p <0.001),呼吸困难(分别为5.7、6.5、0.1,p <0.001)和腿部疲劳(分别为4.2、5.4、1.4,p <0.001)。在这项横断面研究中,有重要证据表明电子烟的使用并非无害。与健康的非吸烟者对照组相比,这在明显健康的电子烟使用者中表现得尤为明显。与非吸烟者相比,长期使用电子烟与功能能力下降有关。在进行6分钟步行测试后,与非吸烟者相比,慢性电子烟使用者的6MWT步行距离减少,博格量表得分更高,氧饱和度百分比更低。与不吸烟者相比,当前研究中电子烟使用者组和可燃香烟吸烟者组的所有评估参数都类似地降低,两组吸烟者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信