A Review of the Impact of Sporting Role Model-Led Interventions on Physical Activity and Sport Participation of Female Youth

Q1 Social Sciences
Eimear Kelly, Katie Liston, Kieran Dowd, Aoife Lane
{"title":"A Review of the Impact of Sporting Role Model-Led Interventions on Physical Activity and Sport Participation of Female Youth","authors":"Eimear Kelly, Katie Liston, Kieran Dowd, Aoife Lane","doi":"10.1123/wspaj.2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a lack of evidence of on the impact of how sporting role models (SRM) influence adolescent physical activity (PA) and/or sport participation (SP) levels. The main aim of this review was to identify SRM-led interventions and highlight the evidence of impact of SRMs on female adolescents’ participation in PA and/or SP. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature using key search terms was completed using electronic databases (APA PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) Participants were ≤18 years old, (b) results were reported for female participants, (c) the study included an intervention arm/element, (d) an SRM or equivalent terminology was used as part of the intervention, (e) PA levels and/or SP was evaluated, and (f) peer-reviewed articles published in English. A total of 7,169 peer-reviewed articles were identified and screened. A systematic review of grey literature to identify SRM programs was also carried out through Google search engine, direct contact with relevant sporting organizations, and with authors who had written about role models, and 45 programs were identified. Identified documents were screened using the same inclusion criteria as described above. The results identified one peer-reviewed and 15 grey literature programs, all of which were deemed to be of poor quality. The programs revealed a lack of theoretical base and rigor in methodology, no objective PA or SP assessment, poor demographic context of participants and role models, and lack of evaluation.","PeriodicalId":36995,"journal":{"name":"Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence of on the impact of how sporting role models (SRM) influence adolescent physical activity (PA) and/or sport participation (SP) levels. The main aim of this review was to identify SRM-led interventions and highlight the evidence of impact of SRMs on female adolescents’ participation in PA and/or SP. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature using key search terms was completed using electronic databases (APA PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) Participants were ≤18 years old, (b) results were reported for female participants, (c) the study included an intervention arm/element, (d) an SRM or equivalent terminology was used as part of the intervention, (e) PA levels and/or SP was evaluated, and (f) peer-reviewed articles published in English. A total of 7,169 peer-reviewed articles were identified and screened. A systematic review of grey literature to identify SRM programs was also carried out through Google search engine, direct contact with relevant sporting organizations, and with authors who had written about role models, and 45 programs were identified. Identified documents were screened using the same inclusion criteria as described above. The results identified one peer-reviewed and 15 grey literature programs, all of which were deemed to be of poor quality. The programs revealed a lack of theoretical base and rigor in methodology, no objective PA or SP assessment, poor demographic context of participants and role models, and lack of evaluation.
体育榜样主导干预对女性青年身体活动和体育参与的影响综述
关于运动榜样(SRM)如何影响青少年身体活动(PA)和/或运动参与(SP)水平的证据缺乏。本综述的主要目的是确定srm主导的干预措施,并强调srm对女性青少年参与PA和/或SP的影响的证据。通过电子数据库(APA PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus和PubMed)完成了对同行评议文献的系统综述,并使用关键搜索词进行了检索。纳入标准如下:(a)参与者年龄≤18岁,(b)报告了女性参与者的结果,(c)研究包括干预臂/元素,(d)使用SRM或等效术语作为干预的一部分,(e)评估PA水平和/或SP, (f)以英文发表的同行评议文章。共筛选了7169篇同行评议文章。通过谷歌搜索引擎、与相关体育组织的直接联系以及与撰写过角色榜样的作者的联系,对灰色文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定SRM项目,并确定了45个项目。使用与上述相同的纳入标准筛选确定的文件。结果确定了一个同行评审和15个灰色文献项目,所有这些项目都被认为质量很差。这些项目缺乏理论基础和严谨的方法,没有客观的PA或SP评估,参与者和榜样的人口背景不佳,缺乏评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信