An Evaluation Framework for the Impact of Digitalization on the Quality of Governance

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Darusalam Darusalam, Marijn Janssen, Jamaliah Said, Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi, Normah Omar
{"title":"An Evaluation Framework for the Impact of Digitalization on the Quality of Governance","authors":"Darusalam Darusalam, Marijn Janssen, Jamaliah Said, Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi, Normah Omar","doi":"10.4018/ijpada.332880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal is to develop an evaluation framework for the quality of governance (QoG) and to evaluate the impact of government digitalization on the QoG for Indonesia. The study develops an evaluation framework to determine the impact of digitalization on the QoG. Data were collected to test the framework in practice by interviewing 10 state apparati and organizing small-group discussions. The manual process of the state government officers' selection in Indonesia is considered very poor and vulnerable to corruption, collusion, and nepotism. The interviewees agreed that digitalization resulted in improved transparency and QoG. Overall, information digitalization has a dual impact as it led to improving service quality, transparency, and government accountability, but it did not result in less corruption, collusion, and nepotism. The findings suggest that digitalizing needs to be complemented by introducing checks and controls to reduce these problems. An evaluation framework offers important insights for digitalization and helps to identify opportunities to improve the QoG further.","PeriodicalId":42809,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","volume":"3 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.332880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal is to develop an evaluation framework for the quality of governance (QoG) and to evaluate the impact of government digitalization on the QoG for Indonesia. The study develops an evaluation framework to determine the impact of digitalization on the QoG. Data were collected to test the framework in practice by interviewing 10 state apparati and organizing small-group discussions. The manual process of the state government officers' selection in Indonesia is considered very poor and vulnerable to corruption, collusion, and nepotism. The interviewees agreed that digitalization resulted in improved transparency and QoG. Overall, information digitalization has a dual impact as it led to improving service quality, transparency, and government accountability, but it did not result in less corruption, collusion, and nepotism. The findings suggest that digitalizing needs to be complemented by introducing checks and controls to reduce these problems. An evaluation framework offers important insights for digitalization and helps to identify opportunities to improve the QoG further.
数字化对治理质量影响的评估框架
目标是制定一个治理质量(QoG)的评估框架,并评估政府数字化对印度尼西亚QoG的影响。该研究开发了一个评估框架,以确定数字化对质量日志的影响。通过采访10个国家机构和组织小组讨论,收集数据以检验该框架在实践中的应用。印尼政府官员的人工选拔过程被认为非常糟糕,容易受到腐败、勾结和裙带关系的影响。受访者一致认为,数字化提高了透明度和质量记录。总体而言,信息数字化具有双重影响,因为它提高了服务质量、透明度和政府问责制,但它并没有减少腐败、勾结和裙带关系。研究结果表明,数字化需要通过引入检查和控制来减少这些问题。评估框架为数字化提供了重要的见解,并有助于确定进一步改进QoG的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信