AVALIAÇÃO COMPARATIVA DA QUALIDADE DOS DADOS DE ELEVAÇÃO OBTIDOS COM GNSS, GOOGLE EARTH E SRTM PARA PROJETOS DE ESTRADAS

George Miguel Farha Diban, Barbara Stolte Bezerra, Maria Lígia Chuerubim
{"title":"AVALIAÇÃO COMPARATIVA DA QUALIDADE DOS DADOS DE ELEVAÇÃO OBTIDOS COM GNSS, GOOGLE EARTH E SRTM PARA PROJETOS DE ESTRADAS","authors":"George Miguel Farha Diban, Barbara Stolte Bezerra, Maria Lígia Chuerubim","doi":"10.5747/ce.2023.v15.e400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining terrain elevation data is essential for numerous engineering applications. However, regardless of the technique used to obtain the elevation data, there will be errors intrinsic to the instruments and to the measurement technique used, as well as depending on the model of Earth representation, which are plane, spherical or ellipsoidal. In this perspective, this work proposes a comparative approach between the elevation data obtained from the geodesic coordinates, provided by Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and those obtained from Google Earth (GE) and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). The data collection was carried out in the urban section between km 125 to km 145,500 of Dom Pedro-I Highway (SP-065), State of São Paulo, Brazil. The quality of the results is evaluated based on the Mean Quadratic Error (RMSE). The main results showed that the elevation data obtained through the SRTM show greater agreement or adjustment to the GNSS data when compared to the higher quality and less variation than those obtained through the GE, since they have smaller RMSE and are closer to the average elevations calculated for the highway segment analyzed. However, it is worth noting that the use of GE can be a good alternative for low-cost preliminary studies.","PeriodicalId":30414,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Exactarum","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquium Exactarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ce.2023.v15.e400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obtaining terrain elevation data is essential for numerous engineering applications. However, regardless of the technique used to obtain the elevation data, there will be errors intrinsic to the instruments and to the measurement technique used, as well as depending on the model of Earth representation, which are plane, spherical or ellipsoidal. In this perspective, this work proposes a comparative approach between the elevation data obtained from the geodesic coordinates, provided by Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and those obtained from Google Earth (GE) and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). The data collection was carried out in the urban section between km 125 to km 145,500 of Dom Pedro-I Highway (SP-065), State of São Paulo, Brazil. The quality of the results is evaluated based on the Mean Quadratic Error (RMSE). The main results showed that the elevation data obtained through the SRTM show greater agreement or adjustment to the GNSS data when compared to the higher quality and less variation than those obtained through the GE, since they have smaller RMSE and are closer to the average elevations calculated for the highway segment analyzed. However, it is worth noting that the use of GE can be a good alternative for low-cost preliminary studies.
道路项目GNSS、谷歌EARTH和SRTM高程数据质量的比较评价
获取地形高程数据对于许多工程应用是必不可少的。然而,无论使用何种技术来获取高程数据,仪器和所使用的测量技术都会存在固有的误差,并且取决于地球表示的模型,这些模型是平面的,球形的或椭球面的。从这个角度来看,本文提出了从全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)提供的测地线坐标获得的高程数据与从谷歌地球(GE)和航天飞机雷达地形任务(SRTM)获得的高程数据之间的比较方法。数据收集是在巴西圣保罗州Dom pedroi高速公路(SP-065) 125公里至145,500公里的城市路段进行的。结果的质量是基于平均二次误差(RMSE)来评估的。主要结果表明,SRTM高程数据与GNSS数据的一致性或调整程度高于GE数据,其RMSE较小,且更接近分析路段的平均高程。然而,值得注意的是,使用GE可以是低成本初步研究的一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信