Examining Academics' Perspectives on Weber's Bureaucracy Approach

Aysun Devrim YEMENİCİ, Mehmet Can TANYOLU
{"title":"Examining Academics' Perspectives on Weber's Bureaucracy Approach","authors":"Aysun Devrim YEMENİCİ, Mehmet Can TANYOLU","doi":"10.11611/yead.1257290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the university's bureaucratic structure where the academics are located based on Max Weber's bureaucracy approach. It is aimed to determine how academicians perceive the understanding of bureaucracy in universities and to make it more effective and efficient. Phenomenological research design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 academics working at universities in different regions of Turkey, and information on the bureaucratic structure of the academicians was obtained. Content analysis, one of the qualitative data analysis techniques, was used to analyze the data. It has been observed that academicians have different opinions on bureaucracy. It has been reached that bureaucratic structures can have positive and negative consequences. As a result, it is thought that the study will contribute to the maintenance or improvement of the functioning of bureaucratic structures.","PeriodicalId":422662,"journal":{"name":"Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1257290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the university's bureaucratic structure where the academics are located based on Max Weber's bureaucracy approach. It is aimed to determine how academicians perceive the understanding of bureaucracy in universities and to make it more effective and efficient. Phenomenological research design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 academics working at universities in different regions of Turkey, and information on the bureaucratic structure of the academicians was obtained. Content analysis, one of the qualitative data analysis techniques, was used to analyze the data. It has been observed that academicians have different opinions on bureaucracy. It has been reached that bureaucratic structures can have positive and negative consequences. As a result, it is thought that the study will contribute to the maintenance or improvement of the functioning of bureaucratic structures.
考察学者对韦伯官僚主义方法的看法
本研究基于马克斯·韦伯的官僚主义方法,考察了大学的官僚结构。它旨在确定学者如何看待对大学官僚主义的理解,并使其更有效和高效。本研究采用了质性研究方法之一的现象学研究设计。对在土耳其不同地区的大学工作的27名学者进行了半结构化访谈,获得了关于这些学者官僚结构的资料。采用定性数据分析技术之一的内容分析对数据进行分析。据观察,学者们对官僚主义有不同的看法。人们已经认识到,官僚结构可以产生积极和消极的后果。因此,人们认为这项研究将有助于维持或改善官僚结构的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信