The Role of Valuation Specialists in Audits of Fair Values and Potential for Change under Amended Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standards

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Emily E Griffith, Jacqueline S Hammersley
{"title":"The Role of Valuation Specialists in Audits of Fair Values and Potential for Change under Amended Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standards","authors":"Emily E Griffith, Jacqueline S Hammersley","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-19-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY The PCAOB recently implemented amended standards on the use of valuation specialists. We report interviews with 42 auditors and valuation specialists in which we describe the role of valuation specialists and problems during fair value audits under the original guidance. We evaluate whether the amended guidance will change practice and mitigate these problems. We find that specialists are more involved in fieldwork relative to planning and completion. Despite changes to communication and review requirements, specialists’ limited role in making conclusions relative to auditors will continue. Our analysis suggests the changes in standards are unlikely to meaningfully change practice. We expect little change because the amended standards will not increase specialists’ responsibility for outcomes or provide them additional guidance, they will not require auditors to acquire valuation knowledge, and they cannot reduce the inherent uncertainty in fair value settings. These issues underlie many of the problems in this area. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-19-100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SUMMARY The PCAOB recently implemented amended standards on the use of valuation specialists. We report interviews with 42 auditors and valuation specialists in which we describe the role of valuation specialists and problems during fair value audits under the original guidance. We evaluate whether the amended guidance will change practice and mitigate these problems. We find that specialists are more involved in fieldwork relative to planning and completion. Despite changes to communication and review requirements, specialists’ limited role in making conclusions relative to auditors will continue. Our analysis suggests the changes in standards are unlikely to meaningfully change practice. We expect little change because the amended standards will not increase specialists’ responsibility for outcomes or provide them additional guidance, they will not require auditors to acquire valuation knowledge, and they cannot reduce the inherent uncertainty in fair value settings. These issues underlie many of the problems in this area. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.
在修订的上市公司会计监督委员会标准下,评估专家在公允价值审计中的作用和潜在的变化
PCAOB最近实施了关于使用估值专家的修订标准。我们报告了对42位审计师和估值专家的采访,其中我们描述了估值专家的角色以及在原始指导下公允价值审计中的问题。我们评估修订后的指南是否会改变实践并减轻这些问题。我们发现,相对于规划和完成,专家们更多地参与到实地工作中。尽管沟通和评审要求有所变化,但专家在得出与审核员相关的结论方面的有限作用仍将继续。我们的分析表明,标准的变化不太可能对实践产生有意义的改变。我们预计变化不大,因为修订后的准则不会增加专家对结果的责任或为他们提供额外的指导,它们不会要求审计师获取估值知识,并且它们不能减少公允价值设置中固有的不确定性。这些问题是该领域许多问题的根源。JEL分类:M40;M41;M42。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信