Economic stimulus measures in the pandemic: the role of fiscal decentralisation

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ceyhun Elgin, Abdullah Yalaman, Sezer Yasar
{"title":"Economic stimulus measures in the pandemic: the role of fiscal decentralisation","authors":"Ceyhun Elgin, Abdullah Yalaman, Sezer Yasar","doi":"10.1093/cjres/rsac047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Is fiscal federalism associated with economic policy responses and stimulus measures adopted by national and sub-national governments to mitigate the adverse economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic? In this paper, we provide empirical evidence that it indeed is. Our results indicate that even after controlling for various relevant factors, countries with fiscally federal (decentralised) governments have adopted larger fiscal and macro-financial policy packages (as a percent of GDP). However, there are no significant differences in monetary-policy responses between centralised and decentralised governments. We also show that these results are robust to using different federalism measures, including different sets of control variables and different econometric specifications that include an instrumental variable estimation.","PeriodicalId":47897,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsac047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Is fiscal federalism associated with economic policy responses and stimulus measures adopted by national and sub-national governments to mitigate the adverse economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic? In this paper, we provide empirical evidence that it indeed is. Our results indicate that even after controlling for various relevant factors, countries with fiscally federal (decentralised) governments have adopted larger fiscal and macro-financial policy packages (as a percent of GDP). However, there are no significant differences in monetary-policy responses between centralised and decentralised governments. We also show that these results are robust to using different federalism measures, including different sets of control variables and different econometric specifications that include an instrumental variable estimation.
大流行中的经济刺激措施:财政分权的作用
财政联邦制是否与国家和地方政府为减轻新冠肺炎大流行对经济的不利影响而采取的经济政策反应和刺激措施有关?在本文中,我们提供了经验证据,证明它确实是。我们的研究结果表明,即使在控制了各种相关因素之后,财政联邦制(分权)政府的国家也采取了更大的财政和宏观金融政策方案(占GDP的百分比)。然而,中央集权政府和分权政府在货币政策反应上没有显著差异。我们还表明,这些结果对于使用不同的联邦制措施具有鲁棒性,包括不同的控制变量集和包含工具变量估计的不同计量经济规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信