Downplaying Euroscepticism in Mainstream Media: The Schengen Accession of Romania and Bulgaria

IF 2.7 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Adriana Ștefănel, Antonio Momoc, Romina Surugiu
{"title":"Downplaying Euroscepticism in Mainstream Media: The Schengen Accession of Romania and Bulgaria","authors":"Adriana Ștefănel, Antonio Momoc, Romina Surugiu","doi":"10.17645/mac.v11i4.7131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have expressed concern about the growth of Eurosceptic discourses in the media since Taggart’s (1998) article on Euroscepticism. While some progress has been made in understanding the media’s role in increasing Euroscepticism, previous studies have primarily focused on Western European media discourses. This research aims to address the knowledge gap on Eurosceptic discourse in Eastern Europe by analysing the impact of the veto against Romania and Bulgaria’s application to join Schengen, as reflected in mainstream media. The research question is: To what extent the Eurosceptic discourse arose in both countries in the weeks before and after the Justice and Home Affairs Council (8–9 December 2022)? The findings indicate that mainstream-mediated discourse employed a strategy of downplaying Euroscepticism. The Romanian and Bulgarian political class labelled the failure to join Schengen as “disappointing,” “unfair,” “unjustified,” and “regrettable.” This research provides evidence of how mainstream media discourses addressed the issue while promoting the European integration project by minimising Euroscepticism.","PeriodicalId":18348,"journal":{"name":"Media and Communication","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Scholars have expressed concern about the growth of Eurosceptic discourses in the media since Taggart’s (1998) article on Euroscepticism. While some progress has been made in understanding the media’s role in increasing Euroscepticism, previous studies have primarily focused on Western European media discourses. This research aims to address the knowledge gap on Eurosceptic discourse in Eastern Europe by analysing the impact of the veto against Romania and Bulgaria’s application to join Schengen, as reflected in mainstream media. The research question is: To what extent the Eurosceptic discourse arose in both countries in the weeks before and after the Justice and Home Affairs Council (8–9 December 2022)? The findings indicate that mainstream-mediated discourse employed a strategy of downplaying Euroscepticism. The Romanian and Bulgarian political class labelled the failure to join Schengen as “disappointing,” “unfair,” “unjustified,” and “regrettable.” This research provides evidence of how mainstream media discourses addressed the issue while promoting the European integration project by minimising Euroscepticism.
主流媒体淡化欧洲怀疑主义:罗马尼亚和保加利亚加入申根
自从塔格特(1998)发表关于欧洲怀疑主义的文章以来,学者们对媒体中欧洲怀疑主义话语的增长表示担忧。虽然在理解媒体在增加欧洲怀疑主义中的作用方面取得了一些进展,但以前的研究主要集中在西欧媒体话语上。本研究旨在通过分析主流媒体反映的否决罗马尼亚和保加利亚加入申根申请的影响,解决东欧对欧洲怀疑主义话语的知识差距。研究的问题是:在司法和内政委员会(2022年12月8日至9日)之前和之后的几周内,欧洲怀疑主义话语在两国出现的程度如何?研究结果表明,主流介导的话语采用了淡化欧洲怀疑主义的策略。罗马尼亚和保加利亚的政治阶层称未能加入申根是“令人失望的”、“不公平的”、“不合理的”和“令人遗憾的”。这项研究提供了主流媒体话语如何解决这个问题的证据,同时通过最小化欧洲怀疑主义来促进欧洲一体化项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media and Communication
Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) is an international open access journal dedicated to a wide variety of basic and applied research in communication and its related fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信