Does the rehabilitation treatment predispose the patient with cleft to endodontic treatment?

Q4 Dentistry
Sávio Brandelero Junior, Renata Artioli Moreira, Lidiane de Castro Pinto, Gisele da Silva Dalben
{"title":"Does the rehabilitation treatment predispose the patient with cleft to endodontic treatment?","authors":"Sávio Brandelero Junior, Renata Artioli Moreira, Lidiane de Castro Pinto, Gisele da Silva Dalben","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8669097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to verify the relation between endodontic treatment of teeth adjacent to the cleft area and the rehabilitation of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, at the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies. Methods: the present split-mouth study was composed of 406 individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who had completed the rehabilitation process in a single tertiary cleft center (55.9% males). The information was collected from the dental history on the patients’ records and radiographs. The frequency of endodontic treatment in the upper incisors and canines was calculated for the cleft and non-cleft sides. The comparison between sides was performed by the chi-square test (p <0.05). Results: endodontic treatment was more frequent in teeth adjacent to the cleft than in contralateral teeth. The frequency of endodontic treatment in at least one tooth adjacent to the cleft was 18.97%, and 11.6% on the contralateral side. It was observed that endodontic treatment was necessary in 63.5% of patients who had been submitted to orthodontic treatment, 42.4% of those rehabilitated with fixed partial dentures and 12.0% of patients who underwent dental reshaping of teeth adjacent to the cleft. The treatments performed included vital pulp therapy (46.1%), non-vital pulp therapy (46.8%) and endodontic retreatment (7.1%). Conclusion: in individuals with complete cleft lip and palate, teeth close to the bone defect area and used for rehabilitation treatment presented greater need of endodontic intervention.","PeriodicalId":34984,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8669097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to verify the relation between endodontic treatment of teeth adjacent to the cleft area and the rehabilitation of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, at the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies. Methods: the present split-mouth study was composed of 406 individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who had completed the rehabilitation process in a single tertiary cleft center (55.9% males). The information was collected from the dental history on the patients’ records and radiographs. The frequency of endodontic treatment in the upper incisors and canines was calculated for the cleft and non-cleft sides. The comparison between sides was performed by the chi-square test (p <0.05). Results: endodontic treatment was more frequent in teeth adjacent to the cleft than in contralateral teeth. The frequency of endodontic treatment in at least one tooth adjacent to the cleft was 18.97%, and 11.6% on the contralateral side. It was observed that endodontic treatment was necessary in 63.5% of patients who had been submitted to orthodontic treatment, 42.4% of those rehabilitated with fixed partial dentures and 12.0% of patients who underwent dental reshaping of teeth adjacent to the cleft. The treatments performed included vital pulp therapy (46.1%), non-vital pulp therapy (46.8%) and endodontic retreatment (7.1%). Conclusion: in individuals with complete cleft lip and palate, teeth close to the bone defect area and used for rehabilitation treatment presented greater need of endodontic intervention.
康复治疗是否使唇裂患者倾向于牙髓治疗?
目的:探讨颅面畸形康复医院单侧唇腭裂患者裂区邻牙根管治疗与康复的关系。方法:本研究由406例完全性单侧唇腭裂患者组成,这些患者在单一三级唇裂中心完成了康复治疗,其中55.9%为男性。这些信息是从患者的牙科病史记录和x光片中收集的。计算腭裂侧和非腭裂侧上切牙和犬齿的牙髓治疗频率。两侧比较采用卡方检验(p <0.05)。结果:牙髓治疗在唇裂旁牙较对侧牙多见。近侧至少一颗牙接受根管治疗的比例为18.97%,对侧为11.6%。63.5%的患者接受了正畸治疗,42.4%的患者接受了固定部分义齿康复,12.0%的患者接受了邻裂牙整形。治疗方法包括生命髓治疗(46.1%)、非生命髓治疗(46.8%)和牙髓再治疗(7.1%)。结论:完全性唇腭裂患者中,靠近骨缺损区并用于康复治疗的牙齿更需要进行牙髓干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences is an international non-profit journal, which publishes full-Length papers, original research reports, literature reviews, special reports, clinical cases, current topics and short communications, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信