Evaluation of Fracture Resistance in Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Different Direct Composite Restorative Material

{"title":"Evaluation of Fracture Resistance in Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Different Direct Composite Restorative Material","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jodh.07.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of three direct resin composite restorative materials on fracture resistance in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities prepared in maxillary premolars. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 maxillary premolars were collected and then divided into five main groups (n=5). Group 1 (positive control group): sound teeth with no cavity preparation. Group 2 (negative control group): MOD cavities with no restoration. Group 3: MOD cavities restored with nanocomposite FILTEK™ Z350 XT Group 4: MOD cavities restored with simplified universal composite OptiShade™ and Group 5: MOD cavities restored with universal nano-filled composite Estelite® Sigma Quick. Results: Group 5 showed the maximum fracture strength value (ranged from 1170-1355 N) followed by Group 4 (998.1- 1158 N) then Group 3 (900.9-1097 N) followed by Group 1 (positive control) with fracture strength value ranging from 836.1 to 1059 N. Group 2 (negative control) showed the minimum fracture strength value ranged (380.6-631.6 N). For the significance evaluation of different groups, One-Way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey`s post hoc test for multiple comparisons which revealed all significant differences between different groups as P-value < 0.05 except for (group 1 # group 3), (group 1 # group 4) and (group 3 # group 4) respectively which were insignificantly different as P-value > 0.05. Conclusion: Reinforcement of the teeth could be achieved after MOD cavity preparation in maxillary premolars through proper restorative procedures.","PeriodicalId":15598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental health, oral disorders & therapy","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental health, oral disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jodh.07.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of three direct resin composite restorative materials on fracture resistance in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities prepared in maxillary premolars. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 maxillary premolars were collected and then divided into five main groups (n=5). Group 1 (positive control group): sound teeth with no cavity preparation. Group 2 (negative control group): MOD cavities with no restoration. Group 3: MOD cavities restored with nanocomposite FILTEK™ Z350 XT Group 4: MOD cavities restored with simplified universal composite OptiShade™ and Group 5: MOD cavities restored with universal nano-filled composite Estelite® Sigma Quick. Results: Group 5 showed the maximum fracture strength value (ranged from 1170-1355 N) followed by Group 4 (998.1- 1158 N) then Group 3 (900.9-1097 N) followed by Group 1 (positive control) with fracture strength value ranging from 836.1 to 1059 N. Group 2 (negative control) showed the minimum fracture strength value ranged (380.6-631.6 N). For the significance evaluation of different groups, One-Way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey`s post hoc test for multiple comparisons which revealed all significant differences between different groups as P-value < 0.05 except for (group 1 # group 3), (group 1 # group 4) and (group 3 # group 4) respectively which were insignificantly different as P-value > 0.05. Conclusion: Reinforcement of the teeth could be achieved after MOD cavity preparation in maxillary premolars through proper restorative procedures.
不同直接复合修复材料修复上颌前磨牙的抗折性评价
目的:研究三种直接树脂复合修复材料对上颌前磨牙中牙合远端(meseo -occluso-distal, MOD)空腔抗折性能的影响。材料与方法:收集上颌前磨牙25颗,分为5组(n=5)。第1组(阳性对照组):未做空腔预备的健全牙。第二组(阴性对照组):无修复的MOD空腔。第3组:使用FILTEK™Z350 XT纳米复合材料修复MOD腔;第4组:使用简化的通用复合材料OptiShade™修复MOD腔;第5组:使用通用纳米填充复合材料Estelite®Sigma Quick修复MOD腔。结果:组5的断裂强度最大值为1170 ~ 1355 N,其次是组4 (998.1 ~ 1158 N),组3 (900.9 ~ 1097 N),最后是组1(阳性对照),断裂强度值范围为836.1 ~ 1059 N,组2(阴性对照)的断裂强度最小值范围为380.6 ~ 631.6 N。对多重比较进行单因素方差分析,然后进行Tukey事后检验,结果显示不同组之间的p值为<除(1组#组3)、(1组#组4)和(3组#组4)差异不显著(p值>)外,均为0.05;0.05. 结论:上颌前磨牙MOD预备腔后,通过适当的修复程序可实现牙体的加固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信