Suicides risk and crises suffered in the context of COVID-19, mediated by interpersonal family communication

Q3 Medicine
Miguel Garcés Prettel, Elías Geney Castro, Karol Gutiérrez Ruiz, Yanin SantoyaMontes
{"title":"Suicides risk and crises suffered in the context of COVID-19, mediated by interpersonal family communication","authors":"Miguel Garcés Prettel, Elías Geney Castro, Karol Gutiérrez Ruiz, Yanin SantoyaMontes","doi":"10.15446/rsap.v25n2.105378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To analyze the relationship between suicidal ideation and the concerns or affectations perceived at the family, economic and health levels during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia and the mediating role of family communication. Method Participants were obtained through cluster sampling and quotas, resulting in 660 Colombians (Z=1,96; variance =,25; error =3,9%), who answered a questionnaire consisting of three reliable scales between November 1 and 30, 2020, after providing informed consent. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the concerns or affectations that most influenced suicidal ideation during this period. Results Thirty-five percent of the Colombian participants presented a high level of suicidal ideation. The concerns or affectations that most strongly explain this level come from the realm of health and intrafamily relationships. The effect of health concerns or affectations on suicidal ideation decreases by up to 32,4% when family communication is open. Likewise, when this type of positive communication is present, the effect of the concerns or affectations perceived in the family, such as breakdowns, distancing and crisis of coexistence, on suicidal ideation decrease between 29,1 and 70,1%. Conclusion Open family communication is a protective factor for mental health in crisis contexts because it can contribute to preventing suicide and alleviate to the concerns or affectations generated by COVID-19. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen mental health programs through a communicative approach aimed at promoting assertive family dialog to achieve greater attention and openness to talk about concerns and affectations suffered.","PeriodicalId":21344,"journal":{"name":"Revista de salud publica","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de salud publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v25n2.105378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To analyze the relationship between suicidal ideation and the concerns or affectations perceived at the family, economic and health levels during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia and the mediating role of family communication. Method Participants were obtained through cluster sampling and quotas, resulting in 660 Colombians (Z=1,96; variance =,25; error =3,9%), who answered a questionnaire consisting of three reliable scales between November 1 and 30, 2020, after providing informed consent. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the concerns or affectations that most influenced suicidal ideation during this period. Results Thirty-five percent of the Colombian participants presented a high level of suicidal ideation. The concerns or affectations that most strongly explain this level come from the realm of health and intrafamily relationships. The effect of health concerns or affectations on suicidal ideation decreases by up to 32,4% when family communication is open. Likewise, when this type of positive communication is present, the effect of the concerns or affectations perceived in the family, such as breakdowns, distancing and crisis of coexistence, on suicidal ideation decrease between 29,1 and 70,1%. Conclusion Open family communication is a protective factor for mental health in crisis contexts because it can contribute to preventing suicide and alleviate to the concerns or affectations generated by COVID-19. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen mental health programs through a communicative approach aimed at promoting assertive family dialog to achieve greater attention and openness to talk about concerns and affectations suffered.
人际家庭沟通介导的2019冠状病毒病背景下的自杀风险和危机
目的分析哥伦比亚2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)流行第一年自杀意念与家庭、经济和健康层面的担忧或影响之间的关系以及家庭沟通的中介作用。方法采用整群抽样和定额抽样的方法,共获得660名哥伦比亚人(Z=1,96;方差= 25;误差= 3.9%),在提供知情同意后,于2020年11月1日至30日期间回答了由三个可靠量表组成的问卷。采用二元逻辑回归评估在此期间对自杀意念影响最大的关注点或影响因素。结果35%的哥伦比亚参与者表现出高水平的自杀意念。最能解释这一层次的担忧或影响来自健康和家庭关系领域。当家庭沟通开放时,健康问题或影响对自杀意念的影响最多减少32.4%。同样,当这种类型的积极沟通存在时,在家庭中感受到的担忧或影响,如崩溃、疏远和共存危机,对自杀意念的影响在29.1%到70.1%之间下降。结论开放式家庭沟通有助于预防自杀和缓解新冠肺炎对心理健康的影响,是危机环境下心理健康的保护因素。因此,有必要通过旨在促进自信的家庭对话的交流方法来加强心理健康计划,以获得更多的关注和开放地谈论所遭受的担忧和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de salud publica
Revista de salud publica Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Salud Pública of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia is published every two months and circulates nationally and internationally, during the months of February, April, June, August, October and December. It is dedicated to disseminate the results of research and knowledge in the different fields and disciplines of public health, and to promote the exchange of opinions that allow strengthening the role of public health as a tool to improve the quality of life of the population. The Institute of Public Health is the academic unit in charge of the Journal of Public Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信