High-gradient magnetic separation mechanism for separation of chalcopyrite from molybdenite

Pulin Dai, Zixing Xue, Xiaowei Li, Yaxiong Jiang, Nourhan Ahmed, Jianwu Zeng, Luzheng Chen
{"title":"High-gradient magnetic separation mechanism for separation of chalcopyrite from molybdenite","authors":"Pulin Dai, Zixing Xue, Xiaowei Li, Yaxiong Jiang, Nourhan Ahmed, Jianwu Zeng, Luzheng Chen","doi":"10.20517/mmm.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Removing molybdenite from chalcopyrite by flotation has long been a challenge due to their similar floatability as sulfide minerals. However, the difference in the magnetic susceptibility of the two minerals may be employed to address this challenge. Recently, pulsating high-gradient magnetic separation (PHGMS) has been reported effective as an environmentally friendly and economical strategy for separating chalcopyrite from molybdenite, but the mechanism of their magnetic differences is unclear. The current investigation employed crystal field theory and density functional theory calculations to theoretically elucidate the magnetic properties of these two minerals, and their difference was further demonstrated by experimental investigations. Under optimized conditions in a SLon-100 cyclic PHGMS separator, a chalcopyrite concentrate assaying 31.47% Cu and 0.44% Mo at 81.93% Cu and 5.56% Mo recoveries was produced from a pure chalcopyrite-molybdenite mixture that initially contained 26.29% Cu and 5.42% Mo. After the separation process, the Cu grade decreased to 15.06%, whereas the Mo grade increased to 16.22% in the nonmagnetic product. These findings have potential implications for the separation of chalcopyrite from molybdenite using PHGMS.","PeriodicalId":319570,"journal":{"name":"Minerals and Mineral Materials","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals and Mineral Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/mmm.2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Removing molybdenite from chalcopyrite by flotation has long been a challenge due to their similar floatability as sulfide minerals. However, the difference in the magnetic susceptibility of the two minerals may be employed to address this challenge. Recently, pulsating high-gradient magnetic separation (PHGMS) has been reported effective as an environmentally friendly and economical strategy for separating chalcopyrite from molybdenite, but the mechanism of their magnetic differences is unclear. The current investigation employed crystal field theory and density functional theory calculations to theoretically elucidate the magnetic properties of these two minerals, and their difference was further demonstrated by experimental investigations. Under optimized conditions in a SLon-100 cyclic PHGMS separator, a chalcopyrite concentrate assaying 31.47% Cu and 0.44% Mo at 81.93% Cu and 5.56% Mo recoveries was produced from a pure chalcopyrite-molybdenite mixture that initially contained 26.29% Cu and 5.42% Mo. After the separation process, the Cu grade decreased to 15.06%, whereas the Mo grade increased to 16.22% in the nonmagnetic product. These findings have potential implications for the separation of chalcopyrite from molybdenite using PHGMS.
黄铜矿与辉钼矿高梯度磁选分离机理研究
由于辉钼矿与硫化物矿物具有相似的可浮性,用浮选法从黄铜矿中去除辉钼矿一直是一个难题。然而,两种矿物磁化率的差异可以用来解决这一挑战。脉动高梯度磁选是一种经济环保的黄铜矿与辉钼矿分离方法,但二者磁性差异的机理尚不清楚。本研究采用晶体场理论和密度泛函理论计算,从理论上阐明了两种矿物的磁性能,并通过实验研究进一步证明了它们之间的差异。在SLon-100循环PHGMS分选机优化条件下,从初始Cu含量为26.29%、Mo含量为5.42%的纯黄铜矿—辉钼矿混合物中分离出Cu含量为31.47%、Mo含量为0.44%、Cu回收率为81.93%、Mo回收率为5.56%的黄铜矿精矿。分离后,非磁性产品中Cu品位降至15.06%,Mo品位上升至16.22%。这些发现对PHGMS从辉钼矿中分离黄铜矿具有潜在的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信