Responsibilities for receiving and using individual participant data

Kylie E. Hunter, Aidan C. Tan, Angela C. Webster, Daniel G. Hamilton, Adrian Barnett, Lee Jones, Myra Cheng, Salma Fahridin, Antonio Laguna-Camacho, Sol Libesman, Mark Hoffmann, Rui Wang, Anna Lene Seidler
{"title":"Responsibilities for receiving and using individual participant data","authors":"Kylie E. Hunter,&nbsp;Aidan C. Tan,&nbsp;Angela C. Webster,&nbsp;Daniel G. Hamilton,&nbsp;Adrian Barnett,&nbsp;Lee Jones,&nbsp;Myra Cheng,&nbsp;Salma Fahridin,&nbsp;Antonio Laguna-Camacho,&nbsp;Sol Libesman,&nbsp;Mark Hoffmann,&nbsp;Rui Wang,&nbsp;Anna Lene Seidler","doi":"10.1002/cesm.12028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sharing of individual participant data enhances the value of existing data to generate new evidence and inform decision-making. While there is strong in-principle support for data sharing, in practice study data are often difficult to find, access, and re-use. Currently, there is no consensus statement to guide the data-sharing process. In particular, more guidance is needed on the responsibilities of data recipients for re-using individual participant data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To determine views on the responsibilities of recipients of study data, and to propose how these responsibilities could be met.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 2-h online focus group was conducted at the 2021 Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-research and Open Science conference. Three example data-sharing scenarios were discussed (evidence synthesis, study reproducibility, and secondary analyses). Notes and audio transcripts were collated using thematic analysis and shared with attendees for further iterative input.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A purposive sample of 16 conference delegates attended the focus group. Analyses revealed four recurring themes that were synthesized into recommendations. The “privacy and ethics” theme described the need for data recipients to prioritize the protection of participant privacy, and the recommendation to proactively share a secure data management plan and evidence of ethical oversight with the data provider. The “capability and resourcing” theme required recipients to demonstrate sufficient capacity to process and analyze study data. The “recognition and collaboration” theme asserted the responsibility to acknowledge the contributions of data providers and invite them to contribute to the secondary project. Last, the “compliance” theme focused on the responsibility to adhere to local data sharing regulations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Successful data sharing and re-use requires cooperation from multiple stakeholders. We identified the responsibilities of recipients of study data to the individual from whom data arose and the research team who collected the data. Implementation of these in practice could facilitate increased data sharing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100286,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","volume":"1 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.12028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.12028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sharing of individual participant data enhances the value of existing data to generate new evidence and inform decision-making. While there is strong in-principle support for data sharing, in practice study data are often difficult to find, access, and re-use. Currently, there is no consensus statement to guide the data-sharing process. In particular, more guidance is needed on the responsibilities of data recipients for re-using individual participant data.

Purpose

To determine views on the responsibilities of recipients of study data, and to propose how these responsibilities could be met.

Methods

A 2-h online focus group was conducted at the 2021 Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-research and Open Science conference. Three example data-sharing scenarios were discussed (evidence synthesis, study reproducibility, and secondary analyses). Notes and audio transcripts were collated using thematic analysis and shared with attendees for further iterative input.

Results

A purposive sample of 16 conference delegates attended the focus group. Analyses revealed four recurring themes that were synthesized into recommendations. The “privacy and ethics” theme described the need for data recipients to prioritize the protection of participant privacy, and the recommendation to proactively share a secure data management plan and evidence of ethical oversight with the data provider. The “capability and resourcing” theme required recipients to demonstrate sufficient capacity to process and analyze study data. The “recognition and collaboration” theme asserted the responsibility to acknowledge the contributions of data providers and invite them to contribute to the secondary project. Last, the “compliance” theme focused on the responsibility to adhere to local data sharing regulations.

Conclusions

Successful data sharing and re-use requires cooperation from multiple stakeholders. We identified the responsibilities of recipients of study data to the individual from whom data arose and the research team who collected the data. Implementation of these in practice could facilitate increased data sharing.

Abstract Image

接收和使用个人参与者数据的责任
个人参与者数据的共享提高了现有数据的价值,以产生新的证据并为决策提供信息。虽然数据共享在原则上得到了强有力的支持,但在实践中,研究数据往往难以找到、访问和重用。目前,没有共识声明来指导数据共享过程。特别是,需要更多关于数据接收方在重用单个参与者数据方面的责任的指导。目的确定对研究数据接收者责任的看法,并提出如何履行这些责任的建议。方法在2021年跨学科元研究和开放科学协会会议上进行2小时的在线焦点小组讨论。讨论了三个示例数据共享场景(证据合成、研究可重复性和二次分析)。使用主题分析整理笔记和音频记录,并与与会者分享进一步的迭代输入。结果有目的的16名会议代表参加了焦点小组。分析揭示了四个反复出现的主题,这些主题被综合成建议。“隐私与道德”主题描述了数据接收方优先保护参与者隐私的必要性,以及主动与数据提供方共享安全数据管理计划和道德监督证据的建议。“能力和资源”主题要求接收方证明有足够的能力处理和分析研究数据。“认可与协作”主题强调了承认数据提供者的贡献并邀请他们为二级项目做出贡献的责任。最后,“合规”主题侧重于遵守当地数据共享法规的责任。成功的数据共享和重用需要多方利益相关者的合作。我们确定了研究数据接收者对数据来源的个人和收集数据的研究团队的责任。在实践中实施这些措施可以促进更多的数据共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信