Aktivisme digital kebijakan pencegahan dan penanganan kekerasan seksual

None Zulfa Annisa Rahmadhani, Bevaola Kusumasari
{"title":"Aktivisme digital kebijakan pencegahan dan penanganan kekerasan seksual","authors":"None Zulfa Annisa Rahmadhani, Bevaola Kusumasari","doi":"10.25139/jsk.v7i2.5323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the process of digital activism carried out by a coalition of pros and cons regarding the ratification of policies on the prevention and handling of sexual violence in tertiary institutions as well as the effectiveness of digital activism from the two coalitions in terms of the implications for policy implementation. This article uses a qualitative content analysis method by analyzing Twitter messages containing the hashtags and keywords Permendikbudristek, Permendikbud, #RevokePermendikbudristekNo30, and #DukungPermendikbud30. The choice of these hashtags was based on the urgency to be able to review public opinion on the ratification of Permendikbudristek Number 30 of 2021 based on the pros and cons categories so that the implications could then be analyzed for the policy implementation of preventing and handling sexual violence. The data obtained in this study were analysed using the theory of digital activism stages which consist of triggering phases, media reactions, viral organizations, and direct action. In addition, data analysis is also focused on reviewing the effectiveness of digital activism carried out by the two coalitions based on several factors that influence the effectiveness of digital activism in achieving its goals, starting from public involvement, long-term strategic plans, mass mobilization, and the level of support received. The results of the analysis show that the stages of digital activism carried out by the two coalitions started with the emergence of a triggering phase which was based on the incompatibility of the substance of the policy with the values shared by several community groups, then was strengthened by the presence of a fairly high media reaction, in this case, social media Twitter. Even though it was not accompanied by the emergence of a viral organisation, there was a direct action by the counter coalition. Furthermore, the results of the analysis also show that the effectiveness of digital activism by counter-parties is categorized as low compared to digital activism carried out by pro-parties based on the achievement of factors that influence the effectiveness of digital activism.
","PeriodicalId":55792,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi Komunikasi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v7i2.5323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the process of digital activism carried out by a coalition of pros and cons regarding the ratification of policies on the prevention and handling of sexual violence in tertiary institutions as well as the effectiveness of digital activism from the two coalitions in terms of the implications for policy implementation. This article uses a qualitative content analysis method by analyzing Twitter messages containing the hashtags and keywords Permendikbudristek, Permendikbud, #RevokePermendikbudristekNo30, and #DukungPermendikbud30. The choice of these hashtags was based on the urgency to be able to review public opinion on the ratification of Permendikbudristek Number 30 of 2021 based on the pros and cons categories so that the implications could then be analyzed for the policy implementation of preventing and handling sexual violence. The data obtained in this study were analysed using the theory of digital activism stages which consist of triggering phases, media reactions, viral organizations, and direct action. In addition, data analysis is also focused on reviewing the effectiveness of digital activism carried out by the two coalitions based on several factors that influence the effectiveness of digital activism in achieving its goals, starting from public involvement, long-term strategic plans, mass mobilization, and the level of support received. The results of the analysis show that the stages of digital activism carried out by the two coalitions started with the emergence of a triggering phase which was based on the incompatibility of the substance of the policy with the values shared by several community groups, then was strengthened by the presence of a fairly high media reaction, in this case, social media Twitter. Even though it was not accompanied by the emergence of a viral organisation, there was a direct action by the counter coalition. Furthermore, the results of the analysis also show that the effectiveness of digital activism by counter-parties is categorized as low compared to digital activism carried out by pro-parties based on the achievement of factors that influence the effectiveness of digital activism.
数字行动主义政策性侵犯预防与治疗
本文描述了一个支持和反对联盟在批准高等教育机构预防和处理性暴力政策方面所进行的数字行动的过程,以及两个联盟在政策实施方面的数字行动的有效性。本文使用定性内容分析方法,分析包含主题标签和关键字Permendikbudristek、Permendikbud、#RevokePermendikbudristekNo30和#DukungPermendikbud30的Twitter消息。之所以选择这些标签,是因为迫切希望能够根据赞成和反对的类别,审查公众对批准2021年第30号国会法案的意见,以便分析其对预防和处理性暴力的政策实施的影响。本研究中获得的数据使用数字行动主义阶段理论进行分析,该阶段包括触发阶段,媒体反应,病毒组织和直接行动。此外,数据分析还侧重于根据影响数字行动主义在实现其目标方面的有效性的几个因素,从公众参与、长期战略计划、群众动员和获得的支持水平开始,审查两个联盟开展的数字行动主义的有效性。分析结果表明,两个联盟开展的数字行动主义的阶段始于一个触发阶段的出现,这个触发阶段是基于政策的实质与几个社区团体所共有的价值观不相容,然后由于媒体的高度反应而得到加强,在这种情况下,是社交媒体Twitter。尽管没有出现病毒式组织,但反政府联盟采取了直接行动。此外,分析结果还显示,基于影响数字行动主义有效性的因素的实现,与亲政党开展的数字行动主义相比,对手政党的数字行动主义的有效性被归类为低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信