A perspective for identifying intersections among the social, engineering, and geosciences to address water crises

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES
Carl F. Weems, Cristina Poleacovschi, Kaoru Ikuma
{"title":"A perspective for identifying intersections among the social, engineering, and geosciences to address water crises","authors":"Carl F. Weems, Cristina Poleacovschi, Kaoru Ikuma","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1280528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable access to safe water is essential for health, wellbeing, and the livelihoods of people. However, water security innovations benefit when engineering and geoscience decisions consider systemic human, social, and organizational realities, needs, and goals. Indeed, true innovation that leads to water security requires intensively inclusive and iterative processes to occur at multiple scales of analysis across diverse sciences—for this, expertise and knowledge across the varied sciences is essential to facilitate such convergent, transdisciplinary research. Here, we articulate our perspective for identifying points of intersection and working across disciplinary boundaries to address water crises. Our perspective takes a multidimensional view of community, organization, family, and individual resilience in the face of natural and human hazards. It builds upon previous models of cumulative water related risk by nuancing the relationships amongst levels of analysis, and expanding the idea of cumulative impacts to include interactive impacts (e.g., buffering, enhancing, effects and other moderators), mediated effects (i.e., mechanisms of impact), as well as additive and suppressive linkages amongst risk and protective factors.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":"355 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1280528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable access to safe water is essential for health, wellbeing, and the livelihoods of people. However, water security innovations benefit when engineering and geoscience decisions consider systemic human, social, and organizational realities, needs, and goals. Indeed, true innovation that leads to water security requires intensively inclusive and iterative processes to occur at multiple scales of analysis across diverse sciences—for this, expertise and knowledge across the varied sciences is essential to facilitate such convergent, transdisciplinary research. Here, we articulate our perspective for identifying points of intersection and working across disciplinary boundaries to address water crises. Our perspective takes a multidimensional view of community, organization, family, and individual resilience in the face of natural and human hazards. It builds upon previous models of cumulative water related risk by nuancing the relationships amongst levels of analysis, and expanding the idea of cumulative impacts to include interactive impacts (e.g., buffering, enhancing, effects and other moderators), mediated effects (i.e., mechanisms of impact), as well as additive and suppressive linkages amongst risk and protective factors.
识别社会,工程和地球科学之间的交叉点,以解决水危机的观点
可靠地获得安全用水对人民的健康、福祉和生计至关重要。然而,当工程和地球科学决策考虑到系统的人类、社会和组织的现实、需求和目标时,水安全创新就会受益。事实上,实现水安全的真正创新需要在不同科学的多个分析尺度上进行高度包容和迭代的过程——为此,不同科学的专业知识和知识对于促进这种融合的跨学科研究至关重要。在这里,我们阐明了我们的观点,以确定交叉点,并跨越学科界限来解决水危机。我们的视角从多方面看待社区、组织、家庭和个人在面对自然和人为灾害时的复原力。它建立在以前的累积水相关风险模型的基础上,对分析水平之间的关系进行了细微的区分,并将累积影响的概念扩展到包括交互影响(例如,缓冲、增强、效应和其他调节因子)、中介影响(例如,影响机制),以及风险和保护因素之间的附加和抑制联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信