Running in Place: “Czeching” out the W/E(a)stern Performative Presidential Geoprostitution

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Nik Hynek, Václav Moravec
{"title":"Running in Place: “Czeching” out the W/E(a)stern Performative Presidential Geoprostitution","authors":"Nik Hynek, Václav Moravec","doi":"10.1177/03043754231202328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to explain the Czech Republic’s geopolitical vacillation between the West and East over the past three and half decades. We tie this behavior, where one orientation never prevails permanently, to the continuity of political elites from the communist to the post-communist periods. In addition to general relevance, we discuss its implications for the country’s recent reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The focal points of this analysis are the geopolitical discourses and practices of three consecutive presidents: Václav Havel, Václav Klaus, and Miloš Zeman, each marking a decade in the Czech presidential office. We provide a historical-structural context to show that the Czech case has been an important example of a small state with its security continuously compromised by the hierarchical penetrations of great powers: Nazi Germany, the USSR/Russia, and most recently, China and the United States. Yet, as we demonstrate, the Czech Republic cannot be considered a stereotypical victim with mixed-sovereignty agreements being imposed on it. We present the three presidents in their active roles of geopolitical architects vis-à-vis the great powers as well as the Czech government. Heuristically, we conceptualize presidential foreign-and-security activities as performative geoprostitution. We show that for Havel, the primary act of geoprostitution was institutionalizing a civilizational client-patron relationship between a small state and a superpower (the United States). In contrast, not only was Klaus and Zeman’s performative geoprostitution different due to its Eastern orientation, but it was motivated by their self-importance and desire to carve out political legacies and greased by corrupted business interests.","PeriodicalId":46677,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754231202328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to explain the Czech Republic’s geopolitical vacillation between the West and East over the past three and half decades. We tie this behavior, where one orientation never prevails permanently, to the continuity of political elites from the communist to the post-communist periods. In addition to general relevance, we discuss its implications for the country’s recent reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The focal points of this analysis are the geopolitical discourses and practices of three consecutive presidents: Václav Havel, Václav Klaus, and Miloš Zeman, each marking a decade in the Czech presidential office. We provide a historical-structural context to show that the Czech case has been an important example of a small state with its security continuously compromised by the hierarchical penetrations of great powers: Nazi Germany, the USSR/Russia, and most recently, China and the United States. Yet, as we demonstrate, the Czech Republic cannot be considered a stereotypical victim with mixed-sovereignty agreements being imposed on it. We present the three presidents in their active roles of geopolitical architects vis-à-vis the great powers as well as the Czech government. Heuristically, we conceptualize presidential foreign-and-security activities as performative geoprostitution. We show that for Havel, the primary act of geoprostitution was institutionalizing a civilizational client-patron relationship between a small state and a superpower (the United States). In contrast, not only was Klaus and Zeman’s performative geoprostitution different due to its Eastern orientation, but it was motivated by their self-importance and desire to carve out political legacies and greased by corrupted business interests.
在原地运行:“捷克”出了W/E(a)严厉的表演总统卖淫
本文试图解释过去35年来捷克共和国在西方和东方之间的地缘政治摇摆。我们将这种行为(一种取向永远不会占上风)与政治精英从共产主义时期到后共产主义时期的连续性联系起来。除了一般意义之外,我们还讨论了它对该国最近对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的反应的影响。这一分析的重点是连续三位总统的地缘政治话语和实践:Václav哈维尔、Václav克劳斯和米洛什·泽曼,他们都是捷克总统办公室的十年。我们提供了一个历史结构背景,以表明捷克的案例是一个小国的安全不断受到大国等级渗透的重要例子:纳粹德国、苏联/俄罗斯,以及最近的中国和美国。然而,正如我们所表明的那样,不能将捷克共和国视为强加于它的混合主权协定的典型受害者。我们介绍了三位总统在他们的地缘政治建筑师的积极角色-à-vis大国以及捷克政府。启发式地,我们将总统的外交和安全活动概念化为表演性的地缘卖淫。我们表明,对哈维尔来说,地理卖淫的主要行为是将小国和超级大国(美国)之间的文明客户-赞助人关系制度化。相比之下,克劳斯和泽曼的表演卖淫不仅因其东方取向而不同,而且其动机是他们的自负和创造政治遗产的愿望,并受到腐败的商业利益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternatives
Alternatives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed journal, Alternatives explores the possibilities of new forms of political practice and identity under increasingly global conditions. Specifically, the editors focus on the changing relationships between local political practices and identities and emerging forms of global economy, culture, and polity. Published in association with the Center for the Study of Developing Societies (India).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信