Knowledge Management Dynamics in Offshore Wind Farms in the Netherlands

Heleen Vreugdenhil, Gerald Jan Ellen, Jort De Vries
{"title":"Knowledge Management Dynamics in Offshore Wind Farms in the Netherlands","authors":"Heleen Vreugdenhil, Gerald Jan Ellen, Jort De Vries","doi":"10.34190/eckm.24.2.1301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Offshore wind farm development is a is a highly complex process. The societal and political pressure to implement is high while environmental responses and future developments in the global energy network are uncertain. Moreover, many interests in maritime space are at stake. The dependency on knowledge for decision-making is high, but the capacity to use knowledge is limited. In this paper we investigate the role of ecosystem knowledge in offshore wind farm planning and management. We have identified 4 types of research arenas: (1) government driven (e.g., monitoring programs) (2) subsidized research (national or EU), (3) industrial or PPS (Public-private partnerships), and (4) research by universities. This study considers the way in which knowledge from different arenas is or could be taken up and used in policy. We identify that particularly government-driven research (monitoring) is used in policymaking. The analysis of policy documents, in-depth expert interviews and focus groups reveals that the distance between knowledge developers and knowledge users may differentiate from purely transactional relations to co-production-relations. However, co-production is rare beyond the monitoring programs directly initiated by the government agencies.","PeriodicalId":107011,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.2.1301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore wind farm development is a is a highly complex process. The societal and political pressure to implement is high while environmental responses and future developments in the global energy network are uncertain. Moreover, many interests in maritime space are at stake. The dependency on knowledge for decision-making is high, but the capacity to use knowledge is limited. In this paper we investigate the role of ecosystem knowledge in offshore wind farm planning and management. We have identified 4 types of research arenas: (1) government driven (e.g., monitoring programs) (2) subsidized research (national or EU), (3) industrial or PPS (Public-private partnerships), and (4) research by universities. This study considers the way in which knowledge from different arenas is or could be taken up and used in policy. We identify that particularly government-driven research (monitoring) is used in policymaking. The analysis of policy documents, in-depth expert interviews and focus groups reveals that the distance between knowledge developers and knowledge users may differentiate from purely transactional relations to co-production-relations. However, co-production is rare beyond the monitoring programs directly initiated by the government agencies.
荷兰海上风电场的知识管理动态
海上风电场的开发是一个高度复杂的过程。实施的社会和政治压力很大,而环境反应和全球能源网络的未来发展是不确定的。此外,海上空间的许多利益都受到威胁。决策对知识的依赖程度高,但运用知识的能力有限。本文探讨了生态系统知识在海上风电场规划和管理中的作用。我们已经确定了4种类型的研究领域:(1)政府驱动(例如,监测项目);(2)补贴研究(国家或欧盟);(3)工业或PPS(公私合作伙伴关系);(4)大学研究。这项研究考虑了来自不同领域的知识是如何或可以被吸收并用于政策的。我们发现,特别是政府驱动的研究(监测)被用于政策制定。对政策文件、专家深度访谈和焦点小组的分析表明,知识开发者和知识使用者之间的距离可能从纯粹的交易关系到共同生产关系。然而,除了政府机构直接发起的监控项目外,合作制作的情况很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信